In what could very well turn out to be one of China’s most significant developments this year, editors at the Southern Weekly have put down their pens in protest against media censorship.
The extraordinary move from one of China’s harder-hitting newspapers highlights the incompatibility of one-party rule with the emerging political freedoms demanded by China’s rapidly growing and highly educated middle class. Undeterred by fears of reprisal, pictures from micro-blogging site Weibo show students and supporters holding signs that call for media freedom and an end to censorship.
Such action gives credit to the Chinese people. Imagine the courage it takes for someone to walk out of their job or a student to take to the streets with their entire future ahead of them, in protest. This is in a country that arrested human rights lawyer Chen Guangchen (陳光誠), detained activist Feng Zhenghu and imprisoned artist Ai Weiwei (艾未未).
One picture on Weibo shows a man holding up a sign saying: “Support Southern Weekly’ and the End to Press Censorship.” Opposite him were numerous cameras; including those of the police.
In the past year, outcries over press censorship have been a recurring issue in the Mandarin-speaking world. In Hong Kong in June, the South China Morning Post limited coverage of the suspicious death of a Chinese dissident prior to a visit by Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤).
The decision was apparently made by the newspaper’s newly installed editor-in-chief, Wang Xiangwei (王向偉), a member of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Congress. A subsequent poll revealed that the vast majority of journalists believe press freedoms have waned in the territory. Seven in 10 pointed to the prevalence of self-censorship in the media.
Self-censorship is a familiar term for journalists in Taiwan. The integrity of the country’s once robust media industry has been in rapid decline since 2008.
Since its purchase by Tsai Eng-ming (蔡衍明), a pro-Beijing businessman with extensive ties to China, the China Times has been best noted for publishing glowing tributes to visits from Chinese provincial leaders. Tsai also controls the Commercial Times, Want Daily, CTi News and CTV, and has other extensive media interests. The widely influential Apple Daily and Next TV appear to be on track to join his stable.
Taiwanese have not stood idly by as this has happened.
Thousands have taken to the streets in protest against the proposed buyout of Next Media Group’s print and television business, censorship and China’s growing influence in the industry in Taiwan.
However, the modest aims of full disclosure and better regulation by the National Communications Commission have, so far, fallen on the deaf ears of a mostly indifferent government.
It is a victory for Beijing, who has a vested interest in a silent media, towing the party line on unification. Tsai, for example, told the Washington Post last year that he could not wait for the deal to be finalized.
The protests taking place in Guangzhou, should be a wake-up call for Taiwan. China’s dreams of censorship are a symbol of ignorance, incompatible with ideals of human rights and civil liberties.
In China, an increasingly modern, educated and tech-savvy population is slowly waking up.
In Taiwan, where media freedom is taken for granted, even more is at stake. Already, the dots are connecting between Tsai’s media acquisitions and Chinese interests. Waking up to this is the only way to ensure that China’s influence does not prevail.
Vincent Chao is a former reporter at the Taipei Times and currently a masters of law candidate at the University of London.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.