Want to buy illegal drugs in China? No problem — just go to the wild and woolly Internet here and order a US$50 or US$100 package of methamphetamines, ecstasy or cocaine. It will be delivered to your door within hours!
“Our company has delivery stations in every part of China,” boasts one Chinese-language Web site, with photos of illegal narcotics it sells. “We offer 24-hour delivery service to your door, and we have long-term and consistent supplies. If you just make one phone call, we’ll deliver to your hands in one to five hours.”
Another Chinese Web site offers meth wholesale for US$19,700 a kilo, or deliveries to your door of smaller quantities in hundreds of cities around China. Even in remote Anhui Province, it delivers drugs in 21 different cities.
All this is completely illegal in China, where narcotics traffickers are routinely executed. However, it does not seem to be a top government priority, because these Web sites are not even closed down or blocked. Tens of thousands of censors delete references to human rights, but they ignore countless Chinese Web sites peddling drugs, guns or prostitutes.
Does it not seem odd that China blocks Facebook, YouTube and the New York Times, but shrugs at, say, guns?
Chinese law tightly restricts gun ownership, but it takes just a few minutes of Chinese-language searching on the Internet to find commercial sites selling, say, an illegal Springfield XD-9 9mm handgun for US$1,120. Or a Type 54 semi-automatic Chinese military handgun for US$640, or rifles or many more. And that is not all.
“For prices of silencers, contact our customer service department,” the Web site advises.
(US gun enthusiasts often argue that we need firearms to protect ourselves from government. However, the situation in China suggests that what autocrats actually fear is not so much people with guns as citizens armed with information and social media accounts.)
In fairness, China is far more sane than the US about firearms. At least the Chinese authorities do not tolerate gun stores openly selling assault rifles and high-capacity magazines. I invite Chinese journalists to write about the fecklessness of US politicians who make no serious effort to reduce the toll of guns in the US.
If your interests run in more prurient directions, the Internet in China is also chockablock with sex and prostitution. GHB, better known as a date-rape drug, is widely sold with chilling descriptions.
“If she drinks this, she’ll be yours,” promises one Internet seller, describing it as “obedience liquid.”
“Only two pills will send her into a deep sleep, so that however you move her she won’t wake up. Afterward, she’ll have no memory,” another says.
The upshot is that most Chinese will not be able to access this column, but can easily go to the Web to purchase firearms or narcotics.
From afar, Westerners sometimes perceive China as rigidly controlled, but up close it sometimes seems the opposite. There are rules, but often they are loosely enforced, or negotiable.
Yet the authorities choose priority areas where they do keep the pressure on, and one is curbing information that might cause political instability. So the authorities block mainstream social media websites and, lately, the New York Times and Bloomberg, after reports about family members of Chinese leaders becoming fabulously wealthy.
It is a tribute to China’s stunning economic development that the country now has some 540 million Internet users, more than any other country. It is sad to see current leaders reverting to a tighter vision of the Internet.
“How can we develop our skills,” one Chinese friend asked me rhetorically, “if we can’t even visit some of the most popular Web sites around the world?”
Many Chinese vault over the “Great Firewall of China” to get to banned sites with a virtual private network or VPN. However, in the last month China, has rolled out new software that interferes with VPNs, even ones used by US corporations to access their internal networks.
The government is also trying to crack down on Sina Weibo, the Chinese version of Twitter, by making users register with their real names.
These Internet crackdowns annoy many young Chinese, who may not think much about multiparty democracy, but do want to be able to see YouTube videos.
My hope is that the new Chinese Communist Party leader, Vice President Xi Jinping (習近平), will recognize that China’s economic competitiveness and ability to fight corruption depend upon openness. Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) used to compare reform to opening a window, admitting a few flies along with fresh air. During Deng’s watch, China embraced potentially troublesome communications technologies — photocopiers, cellphones, fax machines — because they are also indispensable to modernization. So is a free Web.
So, to the new Chinese politburo, a suggestion: How about cracking down on Web sites that sell guns and drugs, while leaving alone those that traffic in ideas and information?
Over the past few years, migrant workers’ rights have improved in Taiwan, but there has not been a comparable improvement in protections for employers, who are faced with a range of challenges, such as family nurses mistreating patients or workers threatening to change brokers or demanding that employers change their jobs. Then there is the decrease in work standards. Migrant workers too often find the lure of the underground jobs market irresistible, are unaware of employment laws and regulations, or have found that National Immigration Agency (NIA) checks are lax, and as a result abscond. If this happens, what protections or
The Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) has been giving daily COVID-19 updates for almost four months, and on several occasions when major developments have arisen, the news conferences have attracted large numbers of viewers. The entire nation is anxious about the pandemic, and interest in the latest news has become a part of daily life. Watching the center’s daily news conferences has become something of a national ritual. The pandemic has stabilized within Taiwan due to the admirable efforts of each person living in the nation conducting themselves with the utmost responsibility, and in certain cases making considerable sacrifices within their
This year marks the 75th anniversary of the end of World War II. In that war’s aftermath, novelist George Orwell produced two prophetic works. The first, Animal Farm, was published in August 1945; the second, Nineteen Eighty-Four, came out in June 1949. Both still ring true and cover a wide range of messages, including even how the mid-sized nation of Taiwan achieved its democracy and why it still maintains an outlier status in a COVID-19 world. With its full planetary scope, WWII left untold millions dead and injured, cities were destroyed and the future path of most nations was altered. New
United States Senator “Kit” Bond (R-MO) was a real leader on Asia policy during his time in Congress. Like most senators, he had a ready one-liner for every occasion. The one I never tired of hearing is “Well, looks like everything has been said. The problem is not everyone has said it.” It’s sort of like with US-China great power competition. There is not much new to say. This is especially true because it’s largely a story of what’s already happened: BRI, Made in China 2025, aggression in the South China Sea, provocations on the Indian border, cyber-hacks, erosion of “one country,