China’s double standards
In a recent news article, The Associated Press (AP) reported that Chris Buckley, a veteran journalist, was forced to leave Beijing on Monday because his work visa was not renewed (“Reporter forced to leave China,” Jan. 2, page 5).
Buckley flew to Hong Kong with his wife and child “amid increased pressures on foreign journalists by the Chinese government, which is concerned over media scrutiny of its top leaders,” AP said.
China, which is happy to post its reporters in Taiwan and New York, the better to gather and report news, apparently does not like to play fair when it comes to other nations wanting to post their reporters in Beijing or Shanghai.
A case in point is Philip Pan, the designated bureau chief in the New York Times’ Beijing office, who applied for a visa in March last year and is still waiting for his papers.
Pan, who is the son of Taiwanese immigrants to the US, and like Jeremy Lin (林書豪) a Harvard graduate, has set up a temporary office in Hong Kong while he waits for the Chinese authorities to furnish him with credentials.
It seems that Beijing will allow a Taiwanese-American basketball star with a Harvard pedigree to visit China to sign autographs and entertain fans, but keeps a Harvard-educated, Taiwanese-American journalist waiting 10 months for a visa application to be either approved or rejected.
Why the double standards?
Dan Bloom
Chiayi
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with