Premier Sean Chen (陳冲) has decided to allow employees of state-run companies to be paid large year-end bonuses despite public incredulity that staff are to be rewarded despite these companies registering huge losses. Chen has said he will assume political responsibility for the policy.
Considering that many legislators are unhappy with the situation and the Control Yuan has raised the possibility of impeaching Minister of Economic Affairs Shih Yen-shiang (施顏祥) for his failure to introduce corrective measures, one can only imagine that Chen must be bracing himself for a further drop in his already desultory approval ratings.
The end of the year is a time of reckoning. Some companies have done very well over the year, some have not. Some people will be getting a fat bonus, while others will receive a token red envelope and still others will not get a single cent.
Take the case of King-Town Rice Co, which retracted a recall in November because a test report about pesticide residues on their rice was misread. It was a farce that badly hit the company’s sales. It goes without saying that bonuses were thin on the ground in King-Town two months later, and the company also had to cut between 70 and 80 percent of its workforce.
Then there are the unwieldy state-run giants, CPC Corp, Taiwan and Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) with their monopoly or oligarchy holds on the market. Regardless of how well they do, virtually everyone employed there can count on a decent bonus. According to the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taipower employees will get bonuses equivalent to 1.6 times their monthly salary, and some will receive bonuses 3.65 times their salaries.
The government explained its decision by saying that these companies’ losses were due to changes in government policy and staff still deserve to be rewarded for their hard work. This stance does not make sense.
Of course, if the government feels it has compromised the employees of these companies by introducing policies that place an undue burden on the firms’ ability to turn a profit, then it would make sense to further subsidize the company by way of mitigation.
However, it is completely unacceptable to reward huge losses with generous bonuses. The principle behind bonuses is simple: the better the performance, the higher the bonus. If one performs badly, one forgoes reward.
However, the government has decided to allow the bonuses anyway. They are too generous, especially when one considers what employees of private companies can expect. Furthermore, it is the salaried workers slaving away in these private companies who will ultimately be footing the bill for state firm employees’ year-end bonuses through their taxes. The government is being criminally insensitive by throwing around taxpayers’ money when taxpayers themselves are having to tighten their belts and purse strings trying to get by.
According to a recent survey by an employment agency, about 48 percent of workers will go without a year-end bonus, and of those that do receive one, more than 70 percent will receive less than a month’s salary. These people have worked hard during the year and many are finding it difficult to accept that CPC or Taipower employees, despite those companies losing money, will still be generously rewarded.
The legislature has yet to approve the budget for these state-run companies, but the allocation of bonuses is a done deal. However there should be repercussions. It is too late to do anything about it now, but the state-run businesses must conduct a transparent review of how they give out bonuses.
The matter needs to be referred to a legislative review, followed by the establishing of a new, fair and just system of comprehensive guidelines governing the allocation of bonuses drawn up by the Cabinet and the ministry. If this does not happen, it is not just the reputations of the companies that will suffer, but that of the government as well.
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.