If Taiwan was a normal country, it would be so much easier to talk with China about the situation that exits between us, without the tensions and issues that currently plague cross-strait relations. Only it is not.
The US achieved its independence when it parted ways with Britain. To a lessor extent, Canada did the same, as did Australia and New Zealand.
Even though all of these countries — except the US — remain members of the Commonwealth, their independent status means that they can maintain amicable relations with their former colonial master.
Bear in mind that US independence was only achieved through war with Britain and yet the US-British relationship is perhaps the closest relationship between two countries in the world today.
If one is to talk of “nations of brotherhood,” the “special relationship” between the US and Britain is an exemplar.
However, the relationship between China and Taiwan is mired by the Gordian issue of what constitutes “China” and the impossibility of separating one from the other: The People’s Republic of China (PRC) on one side and the Republic of China (ROC) on the other.
Militarily, the two still consider each other enemy states. The ROC arms its military specifically to protect itself against an invasion by the PRC, and the PRC is expanding its military, not only to validate its aspirations to be a world power, but also to subjugate the ROC.
China is increasing the number of missiles it has aimed at Taiwan, but the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), which has always sought to monopolize its claim as rightful rulers of Taiwan on the back of its opposition to the Chinese communists, has actually become increasingly pro-China.
This change was not because the Chinese Communist Party has abandoned its plans to stage a military invasion of Taiwan: It was a betrayal of the spirit of the special party/ state/ military conurbation.
Taiwan needs to think about its relationship with China.
Former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) “one country on each side” of the Taiwan Strait formulation was essentially the ultimate ideal, but the fundamental conditions were not in place.
Chen’s predecessor, former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), had proposed a “special state to state” relationship. This was a more practical formulation encompassing the ideal, but it was beset with difficulties as there was no consensus on what Taiwan was for the people living here, simply because people are stuck in a party-state mindset.
Taiwanese, used to democratic elections, have yet to face up to the fact that their country’s very survival may well hang in the balance.
Rather than doing something proactive to make a go of it, there are those who are making arrangements to clear off to another country should the going get tough.
Some even suspect that the president of the country has this in mind, although who can be sure?
Has it not occurred to these people that the majority of the countries that they would clear off to were actually once part of the British Empire? Had these countries not split from the “motherland,” would they have such a good relationship with Britain now?
Taiwan can only properly deal with China if it is a normal country.
If we want to engage with China, without first going through this process, then all Taiwanese –– those who came over with the KMT after World War II and those who were already here –– will be doing so unsure of exactly what we are.
Lee Min-yung is a poet and political commentator.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China