A clear pattern has developed since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) took office in May 2008: When the political situation is positive, he is quick to jump up and take the credit, but when the going gets tough or problems begin to surface, he is just as quick to take cover and shirk his responsibilities.
That was the case in July at the height of the controversy surrounding the allegations of corruption involving former Executive Yuan secretary-general Lin Yi-shih (林益世). In spite of Ma, who doubles as the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman, having entrusted Lin with several major posts in the party and his administration, the president was quick to distance himself from Lin, claiming that Lin’s appointment as KMT Policy Committee director had been made by former party chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄).
This was also the case in August 2009 when Typhoon Morakot wreaked havoc in the mountainous regions in southern Taiwan and a landslide wiped out then-Kaohsiung County’s Siaolin Village (小林) and buried nearly 500 people. Ma, rather than reflecting on his administration’s delayed rescue efforts, shamelessly shifted the blame to the victims by commenting more than once that many problems could have been avoided if people had been better prepared and evacuated earlier.
On Monday, Ma repeated this pattern in an interview with the Taipei-based UFO radio network when he said the government should be more delicate when drafting legislative measures and be more considerate of others when implementing policy. Citing as an example the state-run Taiwan Power Co’s (Taipower) announcement in April that it would increase electricity prices, Ma criticized the company for implementing the hike during summer, adding that this would “naturally fuel public grievances.”
It is unbelievable to see how the president can so easily shift blame onto others. In case Ma needs a reminder, during the summer it was he who was telling the public how necessary it was for electricity prices to increase and reprimanding those who opposed the hike for not understanding economics.
Prior to Taipower’s announcement, the Ministry of Economic Affairs on April 1 had already announced that fuel prices would be increased by between 7 percent and 11 percent, effective from April 2. In other words, the fuel and electricity price hikes initiated by the government were the primary reason behind the increase in the prices of consumer goods and inflationary expectations. Yet, the president still brazenly shifts the blame to Taipower and ministry officials and acts as if he played no role in adding to the public’s financial struggles.
Even if Taipower initially proposed raising electricity prices, the final decision is in Ma’s hands, so to shift the blame onto the state firm is despicable.
This recurring pattern of blame-shifting is especially disturbing because, more often than not, lower-ranking government officials and agencies in the Ma government are made to shoulder the responsibility for the disasters created by their superiors.
This brings to mind the case of Yu Wen (余文), a Taipei City Government staffer during Ma’s stint as mayor of Taipei, who, following Ma’s indictment in 2006 on a charge of misusing his special mayoral allowance, was seen by many to have been Ma’s fall guy. Yu served time for failing to keep Ma’s accounts in order.
In view of this behavior, unless the president begins showing some backbone and accepts responsibility for his words and actions, it looks like more “Yu Wens” will be needed to serve as scapegoats for higher-ranking officials, as the public continues to suffer at the hands of Ma’s incompetence.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs