In his first public address in the US, new Japanese Ambassador Kenichiro Sasae invited Americans to give him “frank advice on how we can manage our relations.”
“If friends can’t tell each other the truth,” he told an audience in Washington, “how can we expect others to do the same?”
Well, Mr Ambassador, in the spirit of candor that you suggested, here are several thoughts on what Japan could do to improve relations with the US. Your timing is excellent, because Japan will elect a new government on Sunday, giving those who take office a chance to make a fresh start on some long-standing issues.
Futenma: The issue of the US air base on Okinawa has become an open, festering sore. After about 15 years of negotiations with the US, your government agreed to move it out of a congested town to a far less populated area, then reneged on the deal. You might urge Tokyo to settle this corrosive dispute by the end of next year.
Whining I: Many Japanese whine about the “burden” of having US bases in Japan. In reality, the “burden” is on US taxpayers, who spend close to 5 percent of their national wealth on military forces, while Japanese taxpayers spend barely 1 percent. Your government might redress that imbalance, at least partly.
Whining II: Many Japanese whine about the “burden” of US soldiers, sailors, marines and airmen being posted in Japan. In reality, the “burden” is on that 20-year-old rifleman who is serving in a strange land far from home prepared to lay down his life for your country. A quiet word of appreciation would be welcome.
Collective Defense: The US is obliged to come to the defense of Japan when threatened, but Japan is under no obligation to aid in the defense of the US. This is a legal, not a constitutional issue, so a parliamentary act could correct this shortcoming.
Engage I: For too long, Japan has been reluctant to exert diplomatic leadership in Asia. A valuable contribution to Japan-US mutual security could come from more imaginative Japanese engagement with other Asians.
Engage II: From a US point of view, the weakest link in the US security posture in Asia is South Korea’s hatred of Japan and Japanese disdain for South Korea, which precludes collaboration between the two US allies. While South Korea is as responsible as Japan for the bitter feelings, Japan could take the lead in resolving the question.
World War II: Most Japanese believe that their nation has atoned for its transgressions before and during World War II. Unfortunately, some of Japan’s neighbors, notably the Koreas and China, plus some Americans and Europeans, disagree. You might suggest that the government find a way, once and for all, to put this issue to rest.
There may well be other issues that ought to be considered, but this modest agenda should keep the government occupied for some time.
Two points in your initial address are particularly noteworthy. You suggested that more US congressional members visit Japan to learn first-hand the issues it is confronting. Good idea, so long as the candid discussions you recommend are substantive and not merely ritual greetings as so often has been the case in the past.
You said that a priority would be “to enhance relations between Japan and the Japanese-American community.” However, it should be based on an understanding that Japanese-Americans in World War II fought by the thousands and died by the hundreds to earn first-class citizenship for themselves and their children. While some Japanese Americans may feel a cultural kinship with the land of their ancestors, it should be understood that in the depths of their spirits, they are Americans first, Americans last, Americans always.
Richard Halloran is a commentator in Hawaii.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and