Reflect on human rights
Dec. 10, Human Rights Day, is an important opportunity to reflect on human rights in Taiwan. While Taiwan has made many advances in human rights since the days of martial law, numerous problems persist.
Many of Taiwan’s human rights problems are rooted in a transition to democracy without transitional justice. The legacy of the authoritarian party-state that governed Taiwan during martial law still influences the politics of the present.
The case of Chiou Ho-shun (邱和順) has spanned almost the entire post-Martial Law era. In many ways Chiou’s case is symbolic of Taiwan’s human rights problems.
Chiou was first sentenced to death in 1989. The case against him was based on confessions made under torture, which were later retracted. In 1994, two prosecutors and 10 police officers were convicted for using torture to obtain confessions in one of the cases. However, Chiou remains on death row and Amnesty International is campaigning for a retrial of his case.
The case of the Hsichih Trio shares much in common with that of Chiou. The three men were also convicted on the basis of confessions extracted by police using torture. They spent 21 years in a legal battle during which they faced the death penalty and spent 12 years in prison. The trio were finally acquitted this year (“‘Hsichih Trio’ are finally freed,” Sept. 1, page 1 ).
More recently, there have been concerns about the judicial process being used as a political tool. Since 2008, a number of politicians from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have faced trial on corruption-related charges. In cases such as those of Yunlin County Commissioner Su Chih-fen (蘇治芬) and former National Security Council head Chiou I-jen (邱義仁), the defendants were found not guilty. This lends weight to claims of judicial persecution (“Rooting out political corruption,” Dec. 3, page 8).
All theses cases highlight the need for judicial reform. This has been something that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has promised since he was first elected in 2008. Yet up to now he has delivered precious little. With Ma’s party controlling both the executive and legislature, there is no excuse for the lack of action.
Furthermore, in 2009, the Ma government ratified two important UN human rights treaties. These treaties do not specify abolition of the death penalty, but impose strict standards on its use (“Taiwan’s sham over death penalty,” Nov. 17, page 8). In spite of this, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators recently put forward proposals to expand the range of crimes in which the death penalty should apply (“Death penalty changes proposed,” Dec. 5, page 3).
Although Taiwan’s government is failing, its civil society is blooming. The tireless work of non-governmental organizations has contributed to many important human rights gains over the past two decades.
The annual LGBT Pride Parade highlights Taiwan’s tolerance and the ongoing efforts of the LGBT community to gain important rights.
Taiwan’s youth are also a cause for hope. University students are at the forefront of the current movement against a media monopoly. Some of these students drew on their experiences in the 2008 Wild Strawberry Movement (“Student protest leader speaks on civil liberties,” Dec. 3, page 3).
Taiwan’s transition to democracy without transitional justice means that the people must be ever vigilant and active in standing up for human rights. Justice and human rights in Taiwan will only come through a grassroots effort of the people.
For the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), China’s “century of humiliation” is the gift that keeps on giving. Beijing returns again and again to the theme of Western imperialism, oppression and exploitation to keep stoking the embers of grievance and resentment against the West, and especially the US. However, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that in 1949 announced it had “stood up” soon made clear what that would mean for Chinese and the world — and it was not an agenda that would engender pride among ordinary Chinese, or peace of mind in the international community. At home, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) launched
With a new White House document in May — the “Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” — the administration of US President Donald Trump has firmly set its hyper-competitive line to tackle geoeconomic and geostrategic rivalry, followed by several reinforcing speeches by Trump and other Cabinet-level officials. By identifying China as a near-equal rival, the strategy resonates well with the bipartisan consensus on China in today’s severely divided US. In the face of China’s rapidly growing aggression, the move is long overdue, yet relevant for the maintenance of the international “status quo.” The strategy seems to herald a new
To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement. First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy. Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn. Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With