Intelligence and answers
I would like to offer some answers as to why people behave the way they do. The recent case from Ireland of a woman who was refused an abortion and left to die seems human intelligence is not what we think. The contradiction between being pro-life and leaving the woman to die really grates on the intellect.
Then we have all the endless conflicts around the world which show that the smartest solution is the same as it was 5,000 years ago — the most intelligent solution one can think of is to start killing people. How can this be? Are we a ship of fools? In short the answer is “yes.”
The “Hydrogen to Human” project exposed human behavior in a stark and shocking new light. You are a living fossil of all the evolutionary successes which allow you to exist, including all your behavior. If you want to see what that behavior is, you need to look at the common behaviors present in every culture; that is who we are, that is why the project was done in Taiwan, whose modern culture is very different from the UK’s, yet with some common traits.
What shows up are four important drivers in DNA: copy, conform, compete and be curious. That is it. So simple, but then complexity never takes complex steps, just lots of simple ones. What also showed up is how the universe always self-assembles into states of greater complexity using pairs of complementary partners. The mind and the body are two such partners, they must be interdependent to exist.
Your mind is not merely brain cells, but a complex entity that creates its own reality and tricks all of us into believing that reality as truth. The real truth must be something that is true for every human being on the Earth.
However, remember “copy and conform.” If we did not do this, we would not work as a group.
Fifty thousand years ago, our only weapons were working together and toolmaking.
The trouble with this is that we are programmed to conform to any nonsense you can imagine, from bad driving to a God favoring one group above all others. This seems obvious when you think that at the same time humans were walking on the moon, that nation that made it happen was killing thousands in Vietnam. Do not think that killing with modern tools is any more sophisticated; it is just more efficient.
The mind controls the body to exist. It needs sugar and water. It drives the body using chemicals which are more powerful than intelligence. Test this next time you are driving — there is always a chemical reaction first. Overcoming the chemicals needs true intelligence and we admire the people who can do it. Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Jesus Christ, former Pakistani prime minister Benazhir Bhutto and former South African president Nelson Mandela are all examples. However, there is also a pattern of such people being killed and persecuted by the rest of us.
We admire them, but soon go back to our chemical ways and nonsense prevails. Is there an answer?
Yes, always work from basic principles. No excuses. If somebody will suffer as a result of your behavior, it is cruelty.
You are programmed to favor yourself and not see it (the selfish gene). We are driven by chemical imbalances which create reactions. Single-cell organisms move, feed and reproduce using imbalance and rebalance as a mechanism to do all the same things as a more complex animal. Now we have no more excuses.
Understanding brings responsibility, but most people will never overcome their chemical triggers, so it is up to the people who choose to understand to lead by example. It is up to them to teach the next generations as the evolution of intelligence stopped at the same time as learning complex language.
Yes, we went to the moon with a caveman’s brain, but a caveman could easily learn how to use a computer or a machine gun.
The sanctity of life
In her letter to the Taipei Times, Flora Faun claims “Pro-life attitudes are the leftover expression of male dominance over women” (Letter, Nov. 19, page 8). She also tells us to “stay out of my womb.” However, Faun has forgotten what a womb is. I am proud to be a pro-life mother.
I feel deeply touched every time I read the passages: “Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you and before you were born, I consecrated you” and “Behold, children are a heritage from woman, the fruit of the womb a reward.”
Whether you credit the source of the womb as God or evolution, the purpose of the womb is beyond dispute: to allow a woman to carry within herself and nurture a new human life; to become a mother.
Being a mother does not begin when the child is born. When a woman is pregnant she can feel the life that is inside of her womb. All mothers talk to this little person often, enjoying feeling this precious new life in their bellies. The mother carries her child for nine months with all the love and tenderness she can give.
So it is false and dehumanizing to say that abortion is just like having a tooth removed. Abortion erases human lives; lives that can never be rebuilt later like teeth through dental restoration.
I agree with the opinions stated by Edmund Ryden in a recent letter (Letter, Nov. 14, page 8): “Human rights cannot be established without morality because our lives are interconnected from our inception in the womb of our mothers. The life-giving mystery of a mother’s womb should not be reduced to a political slogan.”
I want to end by quoting Dr & Mrs Willke: “The greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is a war against the child ... and if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another?”
Chinese strongman Xi Jinping (習近平) hasn’t had a very good spring, either economically or politically. Not that long ago, he seemed to be riding high. The PRC economy had been on a long winning streak of more than six percent annual growth, catapulting the world’s most populous nation into the second-largest power, behind only the United States. Hundreds of millions had been brought out of poverty. Beijing’s military too had emerged as the most powerful in Asia, lagging only behind the US, the long-time leader on the global stage. One can attribute much of the recent downturn to the international economic
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
Taiwan has for decades singlehandedly borne the brunt of a revanchist, ultra-nationalist China — until now. Ever since Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison had the temerity to call for a transparent, international investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, Beijing has been turning the screws on Canberra. This has included unleashing aggressive “wolf warrior” diplomats to intimidate Australian policymakers, enacting punitive tariffs on its exports, and threatening an embargo on Chinese tourists and students to the nation. A tense situation became more serious on June 19 after Morrison revealed that a “sophisticated state-based actor” — read: China — had launched a
Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) is to be Taiwan’s next representative to the US. Hsiao is well versed in international affairs and Taiwan-US relations. In her days as a student in the US, she was a member of the Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA) and served as chief executive of the Democratic Progressive Party’s US mission. She is familiar with a broad spectrum of Taiwanese affairs in the US. FAPA hopes that Hsiao, after taking up her new post, would continue to deepen and normalize relations between Taiwan and the US, and that she would try to get a free-trade agreement