There has always been fighting between central and local governments regarding allocation of financial resources, and it usually ends up with the central government, which controls allocation, demanding that local governments depend less on the central government, rein in spending and generate more revenue themselves.
However, this time, a proposed amendment to the Public Debt Act (公共債務法) has led to “rebellion” from unsatisfied local governments. In particular from Taipei, as the capital is likely to face an estimated decrease of NT$183.7 billion (US$6.32 billion) in its loan capacity. Additionally, vigorous discussions over another amendment to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) is likely to spend a prolonged period in the legislature before both the amendments are made law.
However, what ought to gain our attention about the ongoing fight over financial resources — besides political conspiracies connected to a presidential bid in the 2016 presidential election — is the question of who should back down, and how a win-win solution can be found to avoid further endangering the nation’s finances.
Last month, the Cabinet approved the proposed amendment to the Public Debt Act, which aims to adjust the amount of money that both central and local governments can borrow in the coming years. The amendment is also seen as a way of helping the recently created special municipalities of Greater Taichung, Greater Tainan and Greater Kaohsiung to accrue additional loan capacity.
Under the amendment, the total public debt at all levels of government will be capped at 50 percent of the average of GDP for the previous three years, rather than 48 percent of the average of GNP of the previous three years under current laws. Additionally, the amendment sets a debt limit of 41.2 percent for the central government, 7.25 percent for the five special municipalities and Taoyuan County (expected to be upgraded to a special municipality in 2014 at the earliest), 1.43 percent for the remaining 16 counties and cities, and 0.12 percent for all villages and townships.
It is easy to understand why the amendment has attracted dissent from almost all special municipalities.
None of them are satisfied with the proposed debt-ceiling adjustments, with Taipei and Greater Taichung saying that it would lead to funding shortfalls in major infrastructure projects, while Greater Tainan and Greater Kaohsiung called for a level playing field in loan capacity with other municipalities. It is also likely that the amendment to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures, which aims to provide local governments a higher amount of centrally allotted tax revenue, will create more political bickering. However, none of this means the central government should ease local government anger by raising the debt limit. While Taiwan has no foreign debt and its foreign currency reserves are among the largest in the world, national debt has exceeded NT$5 trillion and could hit NT$22 trillion if hidden debt is included.
As economic growth appears increasingly unlikely to keep up with the needs of the times, and has capped national tax revenues, it is only a matter of time before Taiwan becomes the Asian version of Greece, especially if all levels of government think only about how much they can borrow, and politicians still put their own interests before the interests of the nation.
The challenges over the two amendments allow room for a review of the nation’s fiscal health under an electoral system in which politicians tend to make unfulfillable promises to voters, leaving the nation’s financial burden to future generations.
The central government should be prudent in spending taxpayers’ money and local government heads and their political allies should learn to consider options other than debt-financing.
However, Taiwanese should be smart enough to understand why they do not do this.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under