In the 2008 presidential election campaign President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) pledged that he would deliver, during his first term, an economic growth rate of more than 6 percent, per capita income of US$30,000 and an unemployment rate of no more than 3 percent, in what became known as his “6-3-3” policy. He also promised during a televised debate that he would have no problem donating half of his salary if he failed to achieve this.
Well, it will soon be six months into the president’s second term, and he still has not achieved that 6-3-3 goal. Another thing he has failed to do is honor the promise to donate half his salary.
There was no response from Ma to public criticism of his broken promise, but Premier Sean Chen (陳冲) said the president had told him that he already donates more than half his salary every year. The Presidential Office later qualified this by saying: “President Ma has been making donations for a long time now, and has donated a total of more than NT$75 million [US$2.6 million] to date.”
Let us look at the first couple’s finances to clear up the issue, and get the truth behind these supposed donations.
The first lady, Chow Mei-ching (周美青) is retired, and has long been known for her charitable work. She has no income, apart from the 13 percent preferential savings interest rate that she receives after having worked for a state-owned bank. Ma makes NT$470,600 a month. After living expenses, income tax, health insurance and government employees’ insurance premiums, the couple still has a joint average income of about NT$480,000.
They seem to have an extraordinary aptitude for managing their finances, and it’s a shame they cannot bring this formidable talent to bear on the country as a whole, because the nation’s economy and finances are not in good shape.
Second, where exactly does the money Ma donates come from? In the past 30 years the couple have put two girls through school in the US and made donations worth NT$75 million. They also own five plots of land, four buildings, seven life insurance policies and have savings of more than NT$77 million. They really are living testaments to Taiwan’s economic miracle.
No one doubts that Ma “has been making donations for a long time now, and has donated a total of more than NT$75 million” in that period. The question is whether the money came from Ma’s personal wealth, or from the discretionary “state affairs fund” or from the special allowance fund for government chiefs.
Third, where exactly does the money Ma donates go? If it goes to disaster relief overseas or within Taiwan then great. However, if it goes to organizations that he set up himself, such as the New Taiwanese Cultural Foundation or the Dwen An Social Welfare Foundation, then it’s nothing but a trick consisting of deftly moving money from one pocket to the next, helping himself while pretending to help others, and, as the saying goes, making sure the muck doesn’t fertilize someone else’s fields.
Finally, donating what amounts to more than half of one’s salary does not equate to actually donating half of one’s salary. State funds are to be used, not donated, unless the NT$40 million Ma receives annually from the state affairs fund should be counted as part of his salary. If, indeed, it is, then Ma’s combined annual income tax return for the past four years should have been more than NT$46 million a year — rather than more than NT$6 million — for which he should have paid NT$16 million in taxes. If he had donated half of his salary every year, that would have meant donating NT$23 million or more. Do his tax receipts and donation records reflect this?
Conversely, if the state affairs fund is not considered part of his annual salary there is no way it should be used for personal donations. The fact that Ma has pretty much spent NT$40 million worth of state affairs fund, less some NT$10,000, has got absolutely nothing to do with donating half of his salary. His promise of giving away half his salary should he fail to deliver on the 6-3-3 plan, then, is just yet another bounced check.
Chang Kuo-tsai is a former deputy secretary-general of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and a retired associate professor of National Hsinchu University of Education.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry