President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has always been very fond of numbers, like a scientist or the chief executive of a Fortune 500 company.
He likes numbers so much that when presenting campaign strategies, such as his famous “6-3-3” campaign pledge and the “i-Taiwan 12 projects,” he explained almost everything using 16 Chinese characters or less and tends to describe his achievements using Taiwan’s world ranking according to various reports. This approach makes sense, as numbers are often easier to understand than a 1,000-word text explaining government policies.
Recently, Ma proudly announced that Taiwan ranks 13th in the World Bank’s Knowledge Economy Index and seventh in the International Institute for Management Development World Competitiveness rankings this year, showing that Taiwan has great potential and “there is no reason to hang our heads low.”
However, “good” numbers only tell part of the story, as Taiwan also finished next-to-last in the world last year in terms of direct foreign investment, according to the UN Conference on Trade and Development, and by now most people also know that the Ma administration has posted some of the worst unemployment rates and export numbers on record, and that the total national debt, including hidden debt, has surpassed NT$15 trillion (US$513 billion).
As people scratch their heads and try to figure out Ma’s obsession with numbers and 16-character policy explanations, it seems that he has forgotten two of the most important numbers in Taiwan today — 9 million and 600,000: All-out class conflict appears to be brewing between the 9 million private-sector workers and the 600,000 active and retired public servants, who include military personnel, civil servants and public school teachers.
Private-sector workers have accused public servants of being the government’s “favorite sons,” since public servants enjoy a string of benefits which are either unfair, such as the 18 percent preferential interest rate, or are unsupported by law, such as the year-end pension bonus. By contrast, a series of measures implemented by the government this year, namely fuel and electricity price increases, the decision not to raise the minimum monthly wage and the recent insurance fund controversy, have further added to private-sector workers’ financial vulnerability.
Public servants claim they have long made sacrifices for the country with decades of dedicated service, adding that they have endured long periods of lower wages and minimal benefits which make their extra subsidies reasonable.
Both sides claim the hostility has been fueled by discrimination and hatred toward the other group.
The leader of the nation is obligated by the Constitution to take care of all people, regardless of their gender, class, profession or ethnicity. Unfortunately, despite the Cabinet limiting the year-end bonus to two groups of less-privileged retired public servants in order to quell public anger, the Ma administration has done nothing beyond this token measure of damage control to resolve the crisis.
Nor has Ma personally addressed the issue in a public setting to reassure the 9 million private-sector workers that they will be taken care of.
Taiwan used to be a country with one of the smallest wealth gaps. Workers who staged a protest last weekend in front of the Presidential Office did not ask for a reduction in this gap. They only asked to be treated fairly and for light at the end of the tunnel.
Ma should forget about the numbers for now and try to be — as he has said — “sensible” to people’s suffering and sensitive to the worsening social divide between the 9 million and the 600,000.
This situation will be resolved not by mathematics, but by chemistry, and Ma has to step forward and shoulder the responsibility.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under