President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has always been very fond of numbers, like a scientist or the chief executive of a Fortune 500 company.
He likes numbers so much that when presenting campaign strategies, such as his famous “6-3-3” campaign pledge and the “i-Taiwan 12 projects,” he explained almost everything using 16 Chinese characters or less and tends to describe his achievements using Taiwan’s world ranking according to various reports. This approach makes sense, as numbers are often easier to understand than a 1,000-word text explaining government policies.
Recently, Ma proudly announced that Taiwan ranks 13th in the World Bank’s Knowledge Economy Index and seventh in the International Institute for Management Development World Competitiveness rankings this year, showing that Taiwan has great potential and “there is no reason to hang our heads low.”
However, “good” numbers only tell part of the story, as Taiwan also finished next-to-last in the world last year in terms of direct foreign investment, according to the UN Conference on Trade and Development, and by now most people also know that the Ma administration has posted some of the worst unemployment rates and export numbers on record, and that the total national debt, including hidden debt, has surpassed NT$15 trillion (US$513 billion).
As people scratch their heads and try to figure out Ma’s obsession with numbers and 16-character policy explanations, it seems that he has forgotten two of the most important numbers in Taiwan today — 9 million and 600,000: All-out class conflict appears to be brewing between the 9 million private-sector workers and the 600,000 active and retired public servants, who include military personnel, civil servants and public school teachers.
Private-sector workers have accused public servants of being the government’s “favorite sons,” since public servants enjoy a string of benefits which are either unfair, such as the 18 percent preferential interest rate, or are unsupported by law, such as the year-end pension bonus. By contrast, a series of measures implemented by the government this year, namely fuel and electricity price increases, the decision not to raise the minimum monthly wage and the recent insurance fund controversy, have further added to private-sector workers’ financial vulnerability.
Public servants claim they have long made sacrifices for the country with decades of dedicated service, adding that they have endured long periods of lower wages and minimal benefits which make their extra subsidies reasonable.
Both sides claim the hostility has been fueled by discrimination and hatred toward the other group.
The leader of the nation is obligated by the Constitution to take care of all people, regardless of their gender, class, profession or ethnicity. Unfortunately, despite the Cabinet limiting the year-end bonus to two groups of less-privileged retired public servants in order to quell public anger, the Ma administration has done nothing beyond this token measure of damage control to resolve the crisis.
Nor has Ma personally addressed the issue in a public setting to reassure the 9 million private-sector workers that they will be taken care of.
Taiwan used to be a country with one of the smallest wealth gaps. Workers who staged a protest last weekend in front of the Presidential Office did not ask for a reduction in this gap. They only asked to be treated fairly and for light at the end of the tunnel.
Ma should forget about the numbers for now and try to be — as he has said — “sensible” to people’s suffering and sensitive to the worsening social divide between the 9 million and the 600,000.
This situation will be resolved not by mathematics, but by chemistry, and Ma has to step forward and shoulder the responsibility.
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China