It is almost exactly a year since Silvio Berlusconi resigned as Italian prime minister, and on Wednesday he confirmed that he has no intention of standing for office next year. Many in Italy suggested then that the curtain had finally come down on the country’s bizarre second republic. It was, they said, the end of an era in which a media mogul could turn elections into a personality cult. Now, the thinking went, we were entering the third republic.
The past 12 months seem to have confirmed the theory. Some of the major players and parties from the previous two decades have been obliterated. Berlusconi has, by his standards, tried to keep a low profile and in regional elections in May his party gained just 14 percent of votes, down from 30 percent.
Umberto Bossi of the Northern League has resigned, caught up in an embezzlement scandal. In those same elections in May, only two of 12 Northern League mayors were returned at the first ballot. Respected leaders on the left, too, are falling like cards: Last week Walter Veltroni announced his retreat from frontline politics and Massimo D’Alema has offered to do likewise.
However, if certain parties from the second republic seem to have imploded, the nature of the third republic is still extremely elusive. For better or for worse, everyone knew what the first republic was about: From roughly 1948 to 1992, Italy was dominated by loquacious, patrician Christian Democrats. It was crystal-clear what they stood for (Catholicism) and what they opposed (communism), although there were plenty of gray areas when it came to corruption and crime.
The second republic, from 1993 to last year, was dominated by Berlusconi and by his conflation of liberty with libertinism: He warped the country’s democracy into a strange sort of videocracy, complete with showgirls in parliament and bunga-bunga at home.
Quite what comes next is still unclear. The presence of an apolitical technocrat, Mario Monti, as prime minister disguises the fact that there is a political vacuum in the country and, with a general election next year, various politicians are now fighting to fill it.
The most pugnacious is Beppe Grillo. A diminutive comedian in his mid-60s with hair like a shredded sheep, Grillo is a furious orator who represents the anger of the Italian electorate. At huge rallies, he screams into the microphone as he bemoans the epic salaries, perks, criminal records and acts of collusion of the traditional elites. Although he eschews the mainstream media, he has got a large online following and is not averse to pulling off stunts, such as his swim, last week, across the strait of Messina to start his campaign in Sicily (where he is moving around in a campervan).
Grillo’s movement — he prefers “movement” to “party” — is called the Five Stars Movement (M5S). To general astonishment, it took more than 20 percent of the vote in some parts of the country last May, even winning the prized mayoral position in Parma. M5S is currently polling ahead of Berlusconi’s party in regional elections in Lazio, meaning that the satirist is now taken very seriously. Another pretender is Matteo Renzi, the 37-year-old Tuscan who has already been president of the province of Florence and mayor of the city.
He is now running against the leader of the left-wing Democratic Party in upcoming primaries and is nicknamed the rottamatore (scrapper), because of his disdain for Italy’s gerontocracy and for the way in which the same old faces play parliamentary musical chairs.
On the left, too, is Nichi Vendola, currently president of the Puglia region. Gay, communist, with an earring and slight lisp, Vendola has frequently been a refreshingly honest voice in a bland landscape. The only doubt is whether he could ever become sufficiently mainstream for national elections.
The real vacuum is on the right. Berlusconi and Umberto Bossi, who has resigned as leader of the Northern League, leave big boots to fill, and in their absence anyone else looks like a political pygmy. Berlusconi has, officially at least, handed over the reigns of his party to Angelino Alfano, a bald Sicilian who, born on Halloween, looks like something from the Addams Family. Luca Cordero di Montezemolo, an aristocrat, former Confindustria (CBI) chief and now chairman of Ferrari, has an “association” called Italia Futura, but it has explicitly endorsed Mario Monti for a second term in office.
In many ways the situation is remarkably similar to the unstable period between the first and second republics. As happened then, a tidal wave of corruption scandals — this time involving the presidents of Lazio and Lombardy, among others — have disgusted, if not surprised, the electorate. There is a controversial president of the republic (Giorgio Napolitano). There is a longing for fresh faces and new ideas.
However, that very similarity should act as a warning to those who hope that this new republic will be any different from those that came before. Everyone in Italy knows about gatopardismo, the notion made famous by Lampedusa’s novel The Leopard, whereby superficial personnel changes allow everything to remain exactly as before.
The other perennial habit of Italian politics, trasformismo, means something comparable: that left and right are forever blurred and that change merely masks continuity.
One Italian historian, Guido Crainz, wrote recently about how all opposition in Italy eventually gets coopted into the mainstream, sucked into compromise and the marmellata — the “massive jam” — of Italian political life. Never, it seems, is there a clean break with the past and its practices.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry