An article in the New York Times caught my eye. In it, Nick Bilton, a Times columnist, recounts a recent dinner party that he hosted, in the middle of which his phone beeped with a text message.
“Hey, I see you’re having people over,” it read. “OK if I stop by?”
What puzzled Mr Bilton was how this person knew he was having a dinner party.
Then he looked at his guests.
“Over the course of the three-hour dinner,” the poor sap eventually discovered, “my friends posted seven photos on Path, sent six Twitter messages (five with photos), [put] six photos on Instagram and two people checked in on Foursquare.”
“When I added up the collective follower counts of the people in the room, my little dinner party was potentially viewed by more people than watch The Late Show on CBS — over 3 million,” he said.
And, to add insult to (self-inflicted) injury, a few days later he telephoned someone in a work-related call, only to be told by the other person — who has never crossed his threshold — how much he “just loved” the lamps hanging above the Bilton kitchen table.
Welcome to our socially networked world. One of the most puzzling things about it is why normally sane, well-adjusted, intelligent people lose not only their judgment but also their marbles when confronted with the opportunities for exposure offered by Twitter, Facebook, Foursquare, Path, Instagram et al.
As I wrote that, my Twitter stream updated.
“I’m at Leicester Square underground station (central London),” tweeted one of the (normally sane, well-adjusted, etc) people whom I follow. Then I checked with Foursquare, a service to which this person subscribes.
“xxx checked in at Leicester Square London underground station,” it burbled, before excitedly adding that xxx had earned seven “points” for managing to find a major tube station.
Three of these points were for “First time at Leicester Square London underground station,” and four were for “First Tourist Information Center!”
Foursquare, in case you have not come across it, is possibly the daftest application of GPS technology yet devised. It is a mobile application that allows registered users to “check in” at a particular location. Checkers-in are rewarded with “points” and sometimes “badges.” (I am not making this up). Check-in requires active user selection and points are awarded at check-in. Subscribers can also opt to have their checking-in achievements automatically posted to Twitter or Facebook.
But wait, there is more! If you have checked in to a location on more occasions than anyone else over the past 60 days, then you are crowned “mayor” of that location. Of course some other rotter can depose you by checking in even more frantically and no doubt even as I write there are epic tussles going on for the mayorship of various underground stations, or the third litter bin on the left at the exit from a major railway station.
If this business of points, badges and mayorships reminds you of the collection games that five-year-old children play with picture cards, Pokemon accessories and other gewgaws, then you are right on the money. The thing is though, that according to Wikipedia, the Foursquare game is currently being played by 20 million adults, which makes one wonder if perhaps the time has come to rethink the whole business of universal adult franchise. Should anyone this idiotic have the vote?
Actually Foursquare is simply the looniest extreme of this mania for self-revelation. In pondering Nick Bilton’s story about his inadvertently broadcast dinner party, I was suddenly reminded of Erving Goffman’s great book, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, which first appeared in 1959 and which I read as a student in the late 1960s. In it, Goffman uses a theatrical metaphor to interpret social interactions between people. In everyday life, he argues, we are all actors, each of us playing a variety of roles. The audience consists of the other people with whom we interact. And, as in the theater, we operate in two zones — one when we are, as it were, on stage, and the other when the curtain is down and we can revert to being ourselves and discard the role or identity we assume when in the presence of others.
Goffman’s analysis was entirely predicated on the face-to-face encounters of social life as it used to be in a pre-Internet age. In those days, it really was possible to go backstage, as it were: to discard one’s public face and be oneself. It still is, but now you have to switch off your phone and resist the egotistical temptations of social networking and location-based services. And, hey! — if you do that, then maybe people will start inviting you to dinner again.
Late last month, Beijing introduced changes to school curricula in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, requiring certain subjects to be taught in Mandarin rather than Mongolian. What is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) seeking to gain from sending this message of pernicious intent? It is possible that he is attempting cultural genocide in Inner Mongolia, but does Xi also have the same plan for the democratic, independent nation of Mongolia? The controversy emerged with the announcement by the Inner Mongolia Education Bureau on Aug. 26 that first-grade elementary-school and junior-high students would in certain subjects start learning with Chinese-language textbooks, as
There are worrying signs that China is on the brink of a major food shortage, which might trigger a strategic contest over food security and push Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), already under intense pressure, toward drastic measures, potentially spelling trouble for Taiwan and the rest of the world. China has encountered a perfect storm of disasters this year. On top of disruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic, torrential rains have caused catastrophic flooding in the Yangtze River basin, China’s largest agricultural region. Floodwaters are estimated to have already destroyed the crops on 6 million hectares of farmland. The situation has been
In 1955, US general Benjamin Davis Jr, then-commander of the US’ 13th Air Force, drew a maritime demarcation line in the middle of the Taiwan Strait, known as the median line. Under pressure from the US, Taiwan and China entered into a tacit agreement not to cross the line. On July 9, 1999, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) described cross-strait relations as a “special state-to-state” relationship. In response, Beijing dispatched People’s Liberation Army (PLA) aircraft into the Taiwan Strait, crossing the median line for the first time since 1955. The PLA has begun to regularly traverse the line. On Sept. 18 and 19, it
On Sept. 8, at the high-profile Ketagalan security forum, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) urged countries to deal with the China challenge. She said: “It is time for like-minded countries, and democratic friends in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond, to discuss a framework to generate sustained and concerted efforts to maintain a strategic order that deters unilateral aggressive actions.” The “Taiwan model” to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic provides an alternative to China’s authoritarian way of handling it. Taiwan’s response to the health crisis has made it evident that countries across the world have much to learn from Taiwan’s best practices and if