In January, China’s environmental authorities barely averted the contamination of nearly 3 million people’s drinking water after a mining company dumped cadmium — a toxic heavy metal used in the manufacture of batteries, paint, solder and solar cells — into the Longjiang River.
Such threats to health and the environment are not uncommon in China. The water in as many as half of the country’s rivers and lakes is unfit for human consumption or contact.
China has also gained a reputation for food and drug contamination (not to mention lead paint in toys and poisonous toothpaste). For example, in 2008, the industrial chemical melamine was added to milk products in order to give falsely high readings of milk protein, causing the death of six infants and sickening 300,000 other people.
Similarly, Mengniu, China’s largest dairy company, announced in December last year that it had destroyed hazardous products at a plant in the Sichuan Province after government safety inspectors discovered the carcinogen aflatoxin in a batch of its milk.
In 2007, melamine was deliberately added to an ingredient in pet food to artificially enhance its protein levels, causing renal failure in hundreds of cats and dogs in North America, Europe, and Africa. Later that year, diethylene glycol was mislabeled as non-toxic glycerin, then mixed into cold medicine, killing at least 100 people in Panama, including many children.
The following year, crude precursors of the blood-thinning medication heparin were contaminated, causing hundreds of allergic reactions and 19 deaths in the US.
Internal criticism of the Chinese government’s management of health, safety and overall quality-of-life issues is growing. In July last year, following the highly publicized crash of a supposedly state-of-the-art high-speed train in eastern China, Qiu Qiming (邱啟明), a news anchor for the national broadcaster CCTV, turned the disaster into a metaphor.
“While satisfying our need for speed, we might be forsaking many things,” she said. “China, please slow down. If you’re too fast, you may leave the souls of your people behind.”
Given the pervasiveness of Chinese-made goods, China’s safety record concerns consumers worldwide. However, Chinese officials’ piecemeal efforts to restore confidence in the country’s exports — for example, establishing limits for trace amounts of melamine in dairy products and tightening quality control regulations for the dairy industry — are unlikely to reassure foreign consumers or importers.
Indeed, Chinese policymakers seem unable to grasp the importance of crafting appropriate incentives and disincentives. Rather than adopting the Western model of motivating every link in the supply chain to adhere to specified quality and safety standards, Beijing continues to rely on top-down policies.
However, the decentralized, dispersed nature of many industries, the absence of an effective regulatory infrastructure and the lack of firm-level inducements undermine the effectiveness of this approach.
Perverse incentives throughout the supply chain facilitate the widespread, systematic contamination of food and drugs. Both milk producers and heparin-precursor suppliers were motivated to add adulterants that would make their products appear to be of a higher quality than they actually were.
To be sure, Chinese authorities face a daunting task. Only a few decades ago, China was a poor, largely rural country with an agrarian economy and almost no middle class. Today, it boasts the world’s second-largest economy, a thriving manufacturing sector and a rapidly growing, prosperous middle class, while more than half of China’s 1.5 billion citizens now live in cities.
Until relatively recently, environmental protection and consumer safety were secondary issues in the US and Europe.
Just as Europe and the US have made substantial progress in implementing effective health and environmental policies, China’s quality control mechanisms can be improved. When tackling the issue, Chinese officials would do well to heed the proverb: “With time and patience, the mulberry leaf becomes a silk gown.”
Henry Miller, a physician and molecular biologist, is a Wesson Fellow in Scientific Philosophy and Public Policy at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under