A recent edition of Reader’s Digest features an article on places around the world that it calls the “Seven Wonders of the 21st Century.” Whether wonders of the man-made or natural worlds, they are all breathtakingly majestic. However, reading about them provokes a nagging question: While people around the world are working hard to create awe-inspiring works that future generations can be proud of, we in Taiwan might ask what our government plans to pass down to future generations other than ever-increasing debt and poorer living standards?
Among these Seven Wonders of the 21st Century is the Millau Viaduct in southern France, which at 343m is 18m higher than the Eiffel Tower in Paris, and is the world’s highest highway bridge. The viaduct took just three years to build and cost only half of the original budget, equivalent to approximately NT$11 billion (US$376.4 million). A construction project like this that saves money and trouble for the public while giving people something to be proud of is something that one can only dream of in Taiwan, where public construction always involves one corruption case after another.
Let us consider another of the seven wonders, the Akshardham temple complex in Delhi, India. Upon its completion in 2005, the temple became a record-breaker in Indian architecture and a magnet for tourists that rivals the Taj Mahal.
The beautiful temple has 234 hand-carved pillars, a theater and more than 20,000 religious statues. No steel rebar or concrete was used in the construction of the main part of the temple. Instead, it was built using pink sandstone and assembled by expert craftsmen. The building is strong enough to last for thousands of years. So how much did the Akshardham cost to build? The answer — only NT$1.4 billion.
Also included among the seven wonders is the Spring Temple Buddha in Lushan County in China’s Henan Province. At 126m tall, it is the world’s highest Buddhist statue, and cost NT$1.65 billion to build.
The total construction cost of these three man-made wonders that tourists from around the world are lining up to visit comes to roughly NT$14 billion. By coincidence, that is the same amount of money that went up in smoke when Taipei hosted the 2010 Taipei International Flora Expo — a one-off event. While these other countries have created lasting wonders that are admired around the world, can the same thing be said of Taipei’s flower show?
The celebrations Taiwan’s government held for the 100th anniversary of the Republic of China cost almost NT$5 billion of taxpayers’ hard-earned money. Of this, NT$230 million was blown on a frankly mediocre stage performance that ran for only two nights.
Taiwan’s politicians do not even think about how to save public funds. On the contrary, they are always trying to think up new ways of throwing money around. Now, Taichung is planning to host an international flora expo of its own in 2018, and Taipei will hold the Universiade sporting event for students from around the world in 2017. There go a few more tens of billions of New Taiwan dollars.
There is no way we can hope that an incompetent government like ours could ever create a wonder of the world for people here in Taiwan. The most we can hope for is that government officials might be a little more frugal so as not to burden this and future generations with even more crushing debts than we already owe.
Hsu Yu-fang is an associate professor and chairman of Sinophone literature at National Dong Hwa University.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry