On Sept. 11, Premier Sean Chen (陳冲) announced an economic stimulus package focusing on five areas: encouraging innovation, increasing exports, training more skilled workers, attracting investment and improving government efficiency. However, what Chen presented was merely a wrap-up of the conclusion the Cabinet came to during its past five meetings on financial issues and lacked any in-depth analysis of the reasons for the nation’s structural imbalances, especially the negative effects that the shortcomings of the legislature and government administration are having on the economy.
As a result, Chen was criticized by the public, with some calling him a “liar” and likening his policy to President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) “6-3-3” promise when he was campaigning for president in 2008 of achieving 6 percent annual GDP growth, a per capita income of US$30,000 and an unemployment rate of below 3 percent — all of which never happened.
On Sept. 5, the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics announced that the consumer price index last month was 110.74, rising 3.42 percent from the previous year and the highest figure since the global financial crisis started. In addition, an Asian Intelligence Reports Index political and economic risk report also showed that Taiwan’s GDP contracted by 0.18 percent in the second quarter of this year. This not only ranked Taiwan last among the four Asian Tigers, it also placed Taiwan at the bottom of the list of 12 major Asian nations and areas. Taiwan was also the only economy to record a contraction — its worst performance in several years. Taiwan’s unemployment rate of 4.31 percent in July was also much higher than those of the other Asian Tigers.
On Sept. 7, the Ministry of Finance announced that exports last month dropped 4.2 percent from a year ago to US$24.69 billion. It was the sixth consecutive monthly drop in outbound shipments and shows that the nation has gradually been losing its economic momentum for some time now. This is unfortunately not just something that can be blamed on a weak international economy. It is rather something that needs further examination to see how improper government administration is responsible.
The primary symptom of improper government administration is corruption. Lately, there has been a string of corruption cases involving senior officials from the Water Resources Agency, the National Fire Agency and the Criminal Investigation Bureau, as well as the bribery scandal surrounding former Cabinet secretary-general Lin Yih-shih (林益世). There have also been news of several heads of general hospitals taking kickbacks, as well as elementary-school principals being involved in corrupt practices over student lunches. All of these incidents show that the government is not nearly as clean as it was when Taiwan’s economy first began taking off years ago.
Another problem is that a lot of administrative work in government agencies is either outsourced or given to temporary staff or in lieu of military service, and bureaucracy has worsened. Senior or qualified staff spend their days pushing paper to little effect, and sometimes cannot even do this properly. For example, earlier this month in Greater Taichung, there was a case of glaring incompetence in which a document to be submitted to the Ministry of the Interior was stamped by seven different officials before it was finally discovered that the recipient’s name on the paper was that of the former interior minister, not that of the incumbent. All these officials do now is tell the contract or temporary workers what to do, whereas in the past they would have been more directly involved and would have gained practical experience and skills on the job. This trend has been accompanied by a decline in efficiency and morale within government organizations.
Another sign of improper administration is a lack of power when it comes to following through on and enforcing administrative decisions. Government agencies spend too much time, effort and money on making themselves look good, but do not pay enough attention to or do enough when its comes to the issues such as sanitation, safety and order. Such oversight has resulted in harmful foodstuffs, clothing and cosmetics flooding the markets, illegal structures being built and serious issues, such as reduce traffic violations, improve forest and river conservation, protect resources, and deal with environmental, scenic and air pollution, being reduced to mere slogans during elections. Together, these factors have increasingly affected the public’s quality of life.
The public is also fed up with the 18 percent preferential interest rates on pensions for retired civil servants, the 13 percent interest subsidy on pensions for retired staff of state-owned enterprises, and the education subsidy for offspring of civil servants — all of which have no legal basis. Moreover, retired civil servants enjoy holiday benefits equivalent to one-and-a-half months of their previous salary and a 30-year cap on payments for the National Health Insurance premiums. These are all examples of where the social welfare system has gone wrong.
Even worse is that most civil servants retire around the age of 55 and some make use of loopholes in the system to get a lucrative post in private schools or subsidiaries of their former companies. In such places, they often make more than double their original salary, working as a school or company director or some other high-ranking position. And of course, they also receive further retirement benefits from these private firms.
Improper government administration has driven more people into poverty and unemployment and contributed to an increasingly sluggish economy.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under