Angry people are easy to manipulate. Politicians, governments, media and gangsters know this and use it to whip people up into mobs, sometimes leading to organized violence or armed government action in the service of ulterior motives often unknown to the angry people at the grassroots level.
Quite often, the trigger for mob violence is something that many people hold dear, like respect for one’s religion; something they would fight to protect.
In the case of the current Middle East crisis, sparked by an offensive video that portrayed the prophet Mohammed in a negative light, it is quite easy for Muslims to become angry, even to the point of justifying violence against Americans for insulting their most cherished beliefs. It is clear that unscrupulous gangster-politicians and extremists are using this anger to achieve their own ends, directing attacks against their US enemies in the name of revenge for this video.
In the East China Sea, a similar game is taking place with the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) issue. People in Taiwan, Japan and China are emotionally invested in protecting the sovereignty of their countries. Few under the influence of nationalism can stand by idly if they believe their countries have been insulted.
Unscrupulous politicians on all sides of the Diao- yutais issue are using this emotional catalyst to whip up nationalism to a fever pitch, equating the Diaoyutais and their loss with national disgrace. It is a dangerous game, and Taiwanese would be wise to avoid falling victim to.
In Taiwan, the most likely politician to be using the Diaoyutais issue to his own advantage is President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who would like very much for reporters to stop asking questions about the corruption scandal involving disgraced former Executive Yuan secretary-general Lin Yi-hsih (林益世), who allegedly solicited millions of dollars in bribes. Because Lin was a member of Ma’s inner circle, his downfall looks very bad for the Ma administration, and hence this territorial row could not have come at a better time.
Across the Taiwan Strait, the Chinese Communist Party is in the midst of a major political reshuffle, with the downfall of a rising political star, former Chongqing party boss Bo Xilai (薄熙來), and the two-week disappearance from the public eye of Chinese President Hu Jintao’s (胡錦濤) likely successor, Vice President Xi Jinping (習近平), hinting at the possibility of a succession crisis within the secretive leadership. A territorial row with World War II bad guys Japan, painted as the archenemy for decades in popular Chinese media, is just the thing to whip up the emotional masses, already weary from a shaky economy, in support of the government.
In Japan, which already controls the Diaoyutais, or as it calls them, the Senkaku Islands, politicians in the past acted pragmatically on the issue to avoid insulting their neighbors. However, with China acting belligerently based on narrow political issues, and Taiwan backing Beijing up because Ma would like to see the spotlight taken off his corrupt sidekick, Japanese ultra-right nationalists are now successfully maneuvering their nation into a belligerent stance, with growing public support.
There is a small group of people in Taiwan, in China and in Japan using the Diaoyutais issue for ulterior gains. If people give in to emotional nationalism over this issue, these players will get what they want, while those that pay the price will be the public at large, not the politicians.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry