Ten minutes walk from Frankfurt’s main railway station, through a warren of sex shops and seedy gambling dens, two dozen of the most powerful unelected people on the European continent gather once every two weeks to try to save Europe from itself.
Around a large circular table on the 36th floor of the Eurotower that soars over the city center’s red-light district, European Central Bank (ECB) President Mario Draghi chairs the meetings of the governing council of the bank which have supplanted EU summits and finance ministers’ sessions as the key events deciding the fate of the euro — testimony to the failures and fecklessness of the EU’s elected leaders.
The Italian central banker radiates understated gravitas and charm, has been in office not even a year, and has already been dubbed the euro’s savior, the most important central banker on the planet, as well as the most powerful person in Europe, with the possible exception of German Chancellor Angela Merkel.
Draghi’s expanding battery of weapons for combating the euro crisis was to be strengthened immensely yesterday when the European Commission unveiled new draft legislation putting the ECB in charge of supervising the eurozone’s 6,000 banks, with the power to grant and withdraw licenses.
Within a month of taking office in November last year, Draghi delivered a coup, launching a trillion-euro program of cheap loans for Europe’s banks. On Thursday last week, he went much further, announcing a new policy of limitless purchasing of eurozone government bonds known as OMT — outright monetary transactions.
The markets went quiet — Spain, Italy and Ireland rejoiced — as Draghi emphasized for the third time in six weeks that the euro is irreversible. He framed his bold intervention as solidly within his remit to defend the embattled currency.
However, German monetary purists erupted in howls of protest, although it was the German on the ECB’s six-strong executive, Joorg Asmussen, who played a key role in drafting the new policy.
“Only a currency whose existence is out of the question can be stable,” Asmussen told the Guardian in an interview. “What for us is clearly within our mandate is to guarantee the stability of the euro.”
Extreme times generate extreme moves. There is no doubt that the eurozone’s exhausted political leaders are quietly relieved that Draghi is taking some of the heat out of the crisis. While Merkel, the central actor in the euro drama, could never say so publicly, her aides have been known to concede that Draghi is the only person who can rescue the euro — so let him get on with it.
Since the stakes could hardly be higher, for Asmussen the end would appear to justify the means.
“I see an incomplete currency area,” he said. “We’re at a very decisive moment. We need to aim for more Europe, define our place on the globe in the 21st century. If we’re not willing or able to embark on that route, all the achievements of the monetary union, and even of the single market, could be at risk. We don’t know if we’ll succeed, but we’ll work for it.”
GETTING TOO BIG?
However, the sweeping new banking supervisory powers, the bond market intervention and the increasing influence the ECB wields over the fiscal and budgetary policies of the eurozone governments have many worried that the ECB president and the 22 others on the governing council — the 17 central bank chiefs of the eurozone plus the six-strong ECB executive, all men in suits, not a woman among them — are getting too big for their boots.
“The ECB is getting very powerful,” said Jean Pisani-Ferry, director of the Bruegel think tank in Brussels. “It has emerged from the crisis as a strong institution. It deserves more powers, though this is a major challenge.”
Draghi’s predecessor, Jean-Claude Trichet, played a key role behind the scenes in unseating former Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi last year. Trichet’s letters to the Irish government, some of them recently published by the Irish Times, show how he pressured Dublin into its eurozone bailout, arguing that the dire condition of the Irish banks was imperiling the entire European banking system.
Through its involvement in the troika with the European Commission and IMF, the ECB is dictating fiscal and economic policy to eurozone strugglers. In Brussels, senior officials report that ECB staff are ubiquitous at crisis meetings, seeking to steer and influence policy-making by eurocrats and eurozone government officials.
“They’re all over us, wanting to discuss legislation. We try to keep them at arm’s length as it’s none of their business,” one EU official said. “Now with the banking supervision, the buck will stop in Frankfurt. It seems the ECB’s dream may be coming true.”
Asmussen dismisses the talk of an over-mighty central bank, indirectly describing the ECB’s activism as a necessary response to the inadequacies of the eurozone’s politicians.
“Nobody should think that the people in the ECB are megalomaniacs. We think we have an important mandate, but a limited one,” he said. “Some people say that the ECB was the only institution in the crisis able to act. That’s crisis management. It cannot and it should not stay like this. We’re slowly but surely working on empowering other institutions to be able to act.”
However, the conditions Draghi says are needed to trigger the bout of bond buying are frequently explicitly political demands of elected governments.
“The governing structure of the euro area has clear design flaws,” Asmussen said. “It should be clear to everyone that we stand ready to do our part, repairing the monetary transmission mechanism. But in order to be successful others must do their part. Member states must show fiscal discipline, regain competitiveness, and where needed clean up bank balance sheets. And the community of states in Europe must improve the institutional architecture of the incomplete monetary union. Only if these three elements are together can it work.”
Improving the euro’s “institutional architecture” entails the 17 countries surrendering large chunks of sovereignty over budget and fiscal policy to a eurozone “fiscal union” seen as the logical successor to the “banking union” that was to be proposed yesterday.
OVERTLY POLITICAL
While arguing that a common currency cannot function without common fiscal policies, the ECB is playing a much more overtly political role than it did before the crisis when, on the model of Germany’s Bundesbank, it restricted itself to monetary policymaking, inflation fighting and jealously guarded its independence.
Analysts say that that independence will be further eroded by the new powers over eurozone banks, resulting in a conflict of interest between different functions since the ECB will be responsible for supplying liquidity to the banks it is policing and because it will need to be politically accountable in supervising the banks while politically independent in setting monetary policy.
“Accountability is a potential problem,” said Daniel Gros, a German economist who heads the Center for European Policy Studies. “You want the ECB independent of political pressure, but to be accountable on banking supervision. How to square that circle?”
Asmussen is the first to agree and is calling for a “Chinese wall” to be erected at the ECB to avoid any overlap, conflict, or confusion.
“Monetary policy by definition is independent. Banking supervision by its very nature is not. It must be subject to parliamentary and judicial control. We’re open to this request to show accountability to the European parliament and the council [of eurozone governments]. Accountability is needed. In the end it’s about taxpayers money and this is the core competence of any parliament,” Asmussen said.
Draghi has already shown himself to be much bolder than his predecessor, facing down the might of the Bundesbank — apparently with a wink and a nod from Berlin — and taking on a much more political role, always the aim of the French for the ECB and always resisted by the Germans.
“This is uncharted territory,” a senior EU official said. “Draghi is taking risks with his own authority. He’s getting away with it because of the leadership vacuum he’s stepping into. But this can’t last. We know that the politicians will have to come back one day.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry