Newspapers carried a story recently about how the Presidential Office auctioned off 660kg worth of scrap copper in the middle of last month, from melted down official stamps and seals of departments that were no longer needed after the departments had been merged as part of the restructuring of the Cabinet. However, the items that had been reduced to scrap and sold for less than NT$100,000 had a value that cannot be measured in purely monetary terms.
The scrapping is a good example of the lack of awareness within the Presidential Office of the importance of history. The Cabinet restructuring that has been carried out is part of a major organizational reform process. In terms of historical development, it is difficult to express just how important it is. Certain departments, such as the now defunct Government Information Office, were amalgamated into others after decades of existence, and various objects — official stamps and seals included — were the only remaining evidence that they had ever existed at all.
From a historical perspective, there is a convincing argument that they should have been preserved for posterity. That they have been melted down for scrap is regrettable.
The Academia Historica already has presidential seals that have been chamfered to indicate they are no longer in use. It saved these artifacts from being reduced to scrap metal, and they now form part of the Academia Historica’s collection.
The National Archives of the Research, Development and Evaluation Commission (RDEC) is the department responsible for keeping records of everything that happens in Taiwan, but the commission is due to be amalgamated with other bureaus next year, in the next phase of the Cabinet’s restructuring process.
According to the new RDEC director, Sung Yu-hsia (宋餘俠), the official seals and stamps that have been used over the 43-year history of the commission are to be melted down next year when it is amalgamated into the future national development council.
If senior management within the agency responsible for the National Archives thinks this way, it is likely that other departments will follow suit and believe that these official seals and stamps ought to be melted down.
While official seals and stamps from the various institutions are not actual paper documents or records, that does not mean that they are necessarily less historically valuable for this.
If they are seen as documents or records in the wider sense of the term, then such artifacts, that have existed for several decades, are at the very least concrete evidence of the existence of now-defunct departments and institutions.
These objects, with their own unique historical value, could have been chamfered and added to the collection of the Academia Historica. Only then would the record of governmental departments, offices and institutions consigned to the pages of history be complete.
Hsueh Li-kuei is a professor in the Graduate Institute of Library, Information and Archival Studies at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations