The legislative elections held in Hong Kong yesterday are an example for Taiwan. Although Hong Kong’s elections are far from free and universal, they demonstrate public opinion and serve as a litmus test of how the public views China.
With its overbearing rule of the former British colony, Beijing has managed to turn a lot of voters against it. Many Hong Kongers are content to allow a small group of pro-Beijing businesspeople and China-appointed cadres to call the shots when it comes to bigger issues, but when the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) tried to influence education and inculcate their children with nationalist, pro-CCP, propaganda, in an attempt to brainwash the next generation, Hong Kong voters drew the line.
Although Hong Kong Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying (梁振英) caved in to pressure and backed down on the plans for nationalism to be taught in schools, the damage was done. A higher voter turnout, at 53 percent versus 45.2 percent in 2008, helped the pro-democrats retain a key voice in a legislature that could usher in universal suffrage in the next five years. Voters’ resentment at 15 years of Beijing ignoring calls for universal suffrage, the massive influx of Chinese tourism and the ever-ballooning wealth divide didn’t play in the CCP’s favor.
Taiwan’s situation is not that different, although the details are particular to Taiwan’s position. President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) have virtually been acting on the CCP’s behalf ever since retaking power in 2008, and had been doing so even when they were in opposition.
The Ma administration has rolled back education reforms initiated under the Democratic Progressive Party to de-emphasize Taiwan’s unique place in the Asia-Pacific and shift the focus back to Taiwan as a part of an overarching Chinese civilization. It has signed Taiwan’s economy over to China and given Beijing final say in decisions that would give Taiwan a bit of international space — just look at how Ma gushed with pleasure when Beijing gave a tentative green light to Taiwan’s joining the UN-affiliated International Civil Aviation Organization.
However, like in Hong Kong, the Ma administration may have overstepped its boundaries when the National Communications Commission approved the Want Want China Times Group’s bid to acquire the cable TV services owned by China Network Systems, effectively allowing Tiananmen Square Massacre denier and Beijing stooge Tsai Eng-meng (蔡衍明) to create a giant news monopoly in Taiwan.
If there is one thing Taiwanese cherish, it is their daily dose of news. From cab drivers to business owners, young and old alike, all seem to have an opinion about the political situation and the cross-strait balance. Taiwan has more dedicated news channels than most countries and a plethora of programs devoted to analyzing or reporting the news, while radio stations give full vent to political rants at just about every turn.
Jeopardizing the freedom to talk about the news and have an independent opinion on China is hitting Taiwanese where it hurts, just like trying to train Hong Kong children to be Little-Red-Book-toting communists hit them where it hurts.
There is a backlash brewing, and it will be felt in the polling booths, just like the backlash taking shape in Hong Kong right now.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and