When the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government “relocated” to Taiwan 63 years ago in 1949, the party had no assets in Taiwan. Today, it owns a large amount of land, property and stocks, earning several billion New Taiwan dollars from those assets every year. The question is: How many of these assets were obtained through inappropriate means? There has yet to be an investigation into this.
On Thursday, the Cabinet approved a draft political party act, which will be submitted to the legislature for review. This is an attempt by the KMT to legitimize its assets, and an effrontery to the principle of fairness and justice: What it should be doing is returning these assets to the public.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who also serves as KMT chairman, seems to be in on this rather underhanded maneuver. Once again, Ma has showed his “clean” image for the sham that it is.
Recently, Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) Legislator Hsu Chun-hsin (許忠信) examined the KMT’s finances that were officially reported to the Department of Civil Affairs. His research led to some rather shocking findings. From 2005 to last year, the KMT’s Central Investment Holding Co amassed substantial dividends of NT$700 million (US$23.5 million), NT$1.02 billion, NT$800 million, NT$3.07 billion, NT$1.53 billion, NT$2.89 billion and NT$1.46 billion during the seven-year period.
How did the KMT use the money after it went into the party’s coffers? It was used to support its unfair election campaigns, of course. Before the party regained power in 2008, the average dividend was NT$800 million per year. However, after it regained power, the average dividend rose to NT$2.3 billion per year, representing an almost three-fold increase.
Hsu has questioned how it is that, at a time when Taiwan’s stock market has been hit so hard by the global economic downturn, the Central Investment Holding Co can do so well? Has there been any insider trading? Are there any more corrupt officials, apart from the allegedly corrupt former Cabinet secretary-general Lin Yi-shih (林益世)?
From its dividends of about NT$3 billion alone, the KMT may have invested between NT$30 billion and NT$60 billion in the stock market. Should it not be asked to account for the huge amounts of unknown assets it holds?
During the global financial crisis from 2008 to last year, both the international and domestic stock markets suffered. While most Taiwanese investors were suffering financial losses, the KMT still managed to post gains from its stock investments. It had even profited more before the global economy dived. What kind of hocus pocus is this? Did government officials use their influence to benefit from insider trading, “rent-seeking,” or other corrupt activities? And why did the Control Yuan or the Special Investigation Division of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office not respond?
The draft bill that allows political parties to put their assets into a trust is doubtful indeed. Under the KMT’s dictatorship during the Martial Law era, the party accumulated numerous assets through insider trading and benefit tunneling. How can it do nothing about them?
To handle party assets appropriately, perhaps we can learn from the draft bill regarding party asset liquidation and disposition proposed by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Since the DPP proposed it at the Fifth Legislative Yuan, the KMT has blocked it more than 250 times, through whatever means it had at its disposal. Is Ma clean? Look at how he has handled the issue of party assets.
On the face of it, he might have a clean image, but as the saying goes: “All that glitters is not gold.”
Yang Hsien-hung works in the media industry.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this