During typhoons, Taiwanese are hit hard by vegetable price hikes. As a result, the public demands that the government take concrete action to stabilize prices to ease stress in times of floods and landslides. In the past, while senior government leaders promised to hand out strict penalties to those who arbitrarily raise the price of goods during typhoons, they often ended up doing nothing, citing a lack of actual evidence. This created a lot of public discontent.
During the most recent typhoon, public pressure forced the Council of Agriculture to send staff to supermarkets to monitor vegetable prices. However, they ended up miscalculating prices, which damaged the reputations of the businesses involved and eventually led to an apology.
The idiom “the devil is in the detail” comes to mind
This may seem like a clumsy mistake on the part of the officials, but it highlights just how out of touch agricultural officials are with the state of Taiwan’s agriculture, the general cost of things and in particular, vegetable prices. This will inevitably make the public suspicious of the expertise of the council — Taiwan’s highest agricultural administrative body.
This issue makes matters all that much worse for President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) who is already suffering from abysmally low public support. Senior government officials cannot afford to ignore this problem. They must identify the crux of the matter, humbly reflect on where they have gone wrong and try to improve things. This is really the only way the government can win back the trust of the public and farmers.
Shortcomings in the marketing and distribution system for agricultural goods has become a nightmare for Taiwan’s farmers, and the problem of middlemen who jack up the prices of vegetables has never been solved. The council is often criticized. It is said that its officials hold their meetings and draw up policies from air-conditioned offices in Taipei, making it difficult for farmers to submit complaints. They are out of touch with the actual conditions of farmers.
In addition, many of the policies supposed to benefit farmers often fail to please and instead irritate them. The problem is made worse by the fact that many government officials cannot communicate effectively with farmers. Many of the policy goals of officials and academics are not met because the government is worried about the political implications a change of policy could have.
This not only means that problems remain unsolved, but the government’s credibility also gets hurt and people begin to worry about the future of Taiwan’s agriculture.
Given this, on top of the need for central government officials to be more pragmatic and efficient in stabilizing prices, government leaders should improve the quality of the services provided by agricultural officials. They should stop the politicized visits to rural areas and should try to recreate the glorious days of the Sino-American Joint Commission on Rural Reconstruction — the council’s predecessor — which was highly appreciated and trusted by farmers.
In addition, they should organize lifelong learning classes for civil servants and invite academics and other experts to teach them group psychology and the skills necessary for communicating with farmers. They could offer practical tests in the skills they need. Tests could be given to civil servants working in the field of agriculture on issues like agricultural negotiations, laws, trade and marketing and the overall state of agricultural affairs.
These tests could be in the form of exams, random tests and project report, and be made an important part of yearly performance appraisals, rewards and promotions.
Such an approach would be the only way to make civil servants — who may feel they have secure lifelong positions — more willing to visit farmers and personally listen to their opinions and understand their difficulties. This is an important foundation for drawing up and implementing policies. This is the only way to minimize the distance between government officials and farmers and to stop the government from developing laughable policies.
This would go a long way in allowing these government employees to regain the respect and pride they should have as civil servants.
It is also worth noting that many civil servants currently working in the council started directly after finishing graduate school and passing the civil service examinations. These people lack practical experience serving at the grassroots level in rural areas, which creates a situation where bookish people are running the country and drawing up esoteric and irrelevant policies.
The high education of these officials often leads to a superiority complex and creates tension between the central and local governments.
These are all common problems within our public service. To solve them, government’s human resources division should look into ways of mixing up civil servants who work for the central and local governments. They should also make grassroots experience a prerequisite for those seeking promotion within the central government. This would improve the quality of policy making in the public sector and help hone officials’ skills in policy execution and implementation.
Du Yu is a member of the Chen-Li task force for Agricultural Reform.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with