The economic marginalization of Taiwan has not just started; it has been growing gradually since 2000, when the government abandoned the road toward a free economy and instead started working together with countries such as the US and Japan on the road toward integration with China’s economy.
One of the problems Taiwan faces is its constantly declining world export ranking. In 1999, Taiwan’s exports were ranked No. 14 in the world, but by last year they had dropped three places to No. 17. During the same period, South Korea’s ranking rose from No. 12 to No. 7. China performed even better over the same timeframe, rising from No. 9 to the top position. As a consequence, Taiwan’s regional importance has declined, it has slipped from the top to the bottom among the four “Asian Tiger” economies and has become marginalized due to its flagging political and economic influence.
Taiwan’s exports performed even worse between January and last month, suffering a contraction of 5.8 percent, the worst in the region. This should not be blamed on the European debt crisis nor the US economic downturn because these affect all economies worldwide. The question is: Why is Taiwan’s economy slowing so much faster than its neighbors?
The answer lies in the direction that the nation is taking. Since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) came to power in 2008, he has taken an even more active approach than former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) “active opening” policy by moving toward ever-closer integration with China to form a “one China market.”
Marginalization is the phenomenon by which a smaller economy becomes absorbed into a larger economy due to the latter’s market advantages. Because Taiwan’s economy was more developed than China’s, Taiwanese capital, talent and technology quickly flowed to China when policy restrictions were relaxed. This period — the first phase of Taiwan’s marginalization — was characterized by a constantly increasing overseas production ratio and export reliance on China, ie, investment drove exports. This crowded out domestic investment and job opportunities, which caused wages to stagnate and domestic consumption to slow, suppressing economic growth.
Although Taiwan’s economy is highly developed, there are limitations. Its competitive advantages have weakened due to a lack of domestic investment, difficulties in industrial transformation and laziness among Taiwanese businesses, which fail to innovate because it is easier to duplicate the past mode of operation in China. Meanwhile, the country’s import substitution industry has become increasingly complete thanks to the investment of Taiwan’s upper and mid-stream manufacturing sectors in China. The past method of investing in China to boost exports no longer works, and, as a result, Taiwan’s overall economic structures are facing total collapse.
Taiwan’s exports to China as a proportion of its total exports, also known as the export reliance ratio, might now begin to reverse and start to drop, while investments in China might also shrink after having plateaued just after the signing of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA). In the future, tourism, gaming and cultural and innovation industries are likely to become the main focus of Taiwan’s economy, forcing the nation’s economy into the second stage of its marginalization.
The government must change its pro-China economic development strategy in a timely manner. If it does not, no amount of global market expansion plans will be of any use. The recent rapid export decline is likely just the beginning of this, the second, phase.
Huang Tien-lin is a former presidential adviser.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.