President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has said that entering the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement (TPP), which he would like to see within eight years, is the answer to Taiwan’s economic woes. He has also said this policy goal concerns Taiwan’s very survival.
Yes, Taiwan faces considerable competition from abroad, but Ma has yet to take concrete action or make proposals for joining the TPP. So it seems the idea of TPP membership is more about politics than it is about the resolve to join.
First, in eight years Ma will no longer be in office. We will not be able to assess his progress on this on the basis of its eventual results, only on how far he managed to get. So far, the government has done nothing substantial, nor officially informed existing members of the TPP of its intention to join or to enter negotiations, and neither has it come up with concrete proposals. People are beginning to doubt Ma will make any progress on this within his next term.
Second, Ma has said the signing of free-trade agreements (FTAs) with Singapore and New Zealand now will facilitate our joining the TPP — in eight years’ time. Actually, our trade with these two countries represents only 3.8 percent of our total trade volume, and given the degree of difficulty in entering the TPP, it makes little sense to talk of the two in the same sentence. The US government has made it quite clear that if Taiwan wants to join the TPP we still have much to do regarding intellectual property rights and protection of the environment, as well as liberalization of trade, the service industries, investment and the labor market. It will also require Taiwan to respect some rigorous FTAs.
The government really does need to take concrete action and propose some comprehensive plans now to address the economic problems that Taiwan faces given the way the international economic climate is developing. Some 155 Economic Integration Agreements (EIA) were registered with the WTO in 1999, compared to 199 in 2007 and 319 so far this year. The number of EIAs increased by an average of 5.5 per year during the time the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was in government, with another 30 added during Ma’s first term. Regional economic integration has been growing at an astonishing rate, especially within the past four years. In East Asia alone, there were 24 EIAs in 1999, rising to 70 in 2007 and 98 by July last year. One of Taiwan’s main international competitors, South Korea, has already signed eight FTAs and is currently in talks with eight economic entities to sign more, including negotiations started on July 2 with China.
Taiwan, on the other hand, has not signed one FTA with a single East Asian country, and neither have we signed one with a major trading partner anywhere in the world. According to statistics for 2010, the total value of Taiwan’s tariff-exempt exports to five Central American countries and those on the early harvest list of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) signed with China accounted for only 6.9 percent of our total export volume. Compared to those of many countries in East Asia, and especially South Korea, only a very small proportion of Taiwanese products enjoy bilateral free trade, placing Taiwan’s exports in a very unfavorable position in terms of international competitiveness.
The time is ripe for the government to be taking concrete action and proposing comprehensive plans, not coming on like a broken record about how our failure to join the TPP is seriously damaging our economy.
First, it should be broaching talks on joining the TPP with member nations. Second, it ought to be doing more to promote economic deregulation, not just in trade of commercial products but also in the services industries, investment and other fields. Finally, the government needs to, as soon as possible, consolidate a national consensus on what is in the national interest, and make positive moves toward talks on joining the TPP. Only then can we join the TPP before the eight years are up.
Tung Chen-yuan is a professor at National Chengchi University’s Graduate Institute of Development Studies.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry