The details concerning the legal case involving Gu Kailai (谷開來), wife of Chinese politician Bo Xilai (薄熙來), poisoning UK businessman Neil Heywood may be extremely confusing, but following a short seven-hour trial, everyone — including the accused, the defense lawyer, the prosecutors and the judge — were in agreement as to what had transpired. This is perhaps something that could only ever happen in China, or at least something that could only ever be concocted in China.
On the surface, the murder of a British businessman in China may seem somewhat unrelated to the concerns of Taiwanese businesspeople. However, they share one thing in common: They are all businesspeople trying to obtain the special privileges necessary to run their enterprises in a dishonest society that is not administered according to the rule of law. In such an environment, their safety and rights are not guaranteed the protection they would otherwise enjoy in a society under the rule of law.
The official Chinese version of events is that Heywood and Gu had a conflict of economic interests and that Heywood threatened Gu by saying he would ruin her son, Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), if he did not receive money he felt he was owed. Accordingly, Gu then killed Heywood to protect her son.This version suffers from a lack of evidence and it is illogical and full of holes. It also clearly shows how life China is run by the laws of the jungle. Its government and people are not honest, the rule of law is worth nothing and business is conducted in a chaotic and arbitrary manner.
Gu is not only a very wealthy woman married to a former political strongman, she has also been touted as a “famous” lawyer in China who claims to have won court cases in the US. If Gu’s husband was so powerful at the time, why did she put herself at such risk? It is normal for the rich in China to use large sums of money to escape any trouble they may find themselves in, but they very seldom resort to killing people. What’s more, lawyers are experts at fighting battles with the law and using judicial means to solve problems. So why on earth would Gu, a lawyer, go and murder someone?
Heywood was a businessperson who made money by pandering to the politically powerful to win their approval. Businesspeople are generally skilled at bargaining, and making and losing money are all part of doing business. It is my guess that when things still looked good for Bo Xilai politically, Heywood would not have minded making a little less money or even losing some. You would not have expected him to be so short-sighted and threaten the personal safety of Bo Xilai’s son.
China lacks the honesty, democracy and rule of law that a capitalist system needs to function properly. Its system encourages and even normalizes political manipulation in the business arena. This is how China has become the “world’s factory” and the world’s second-largest economy. However, we really need to think about what sort of place China is when the wife of a senior Chinese official would murder somebody over an economic conflict.
With British businesspeople meeting this kind of fate in China, Taiwanese businesspeople cannot trust President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement and other similar empty promises he has made. We must be wary of the huge risks and dangerous traps laid by the Chinese.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs