The trial, conviction and suspended death sentence of Gu Kailai (谷開來), the wife of purged Chinese leader Bo Xilai (薄熙來), has called into question not only China’s legal system, but the very unity of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership.
Let us begin with the many questions raised at the trial. First, Gu claimed that she killed the British businessman Neil Heywood only to protect her son. However, given Gu’s power as Bo’s wife, she could have had someone like Heywood jailed or expelled from China at the snap of her fingers. Still, she not only admitted her guilt, but seemed to embrace it as a sort of historical necessity.
“In order to uphold the sanctity of the law,” she told the court, “I am willing to accept and calmly face whatever judgement I am given, and I also expect a fair and just judgment.”
Not since Stalin’s show trials of the 1930s has a defendant so effusively praised a judge who seemed bound to condemn her at a trial where no witness or evidence against her was presented.
The bitter irony of Gu’s high-speed trial is that she was a true believer in China’s legal system.
Indeed, following a victory in a US court, Gu, a lawyer, wrote a book in which she claimed that China provides “the fairest method of trial.”
She continued, “Chinese lawyers would not quibble over the meaning of each little word. Once they are sure that you murdered someone, you will be arrested, judged, and executed by firing squad.”
Gu was an avatar of the Maoist form of legality that China has maintained long since Mao’s death.
Having failed the entrance examination to Peking University, Gu was nonetheless granted an exception and admitted to read law soon after the Communist Party restored its law departments.
Gu was one of the first lawyers to receive her license. However, with the Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989, the authorities clamped down on the profession’s autonomy. The CCP reasserted control over every aspect of justice through a core department: the Communist Party Central Committee’s Political and Legal Affairs Committee (PLAC).
This totalitarian organ has no known address, yet it manages China’s police, prosecutors, courts and justice ministry, and appoints their leaders. All lawyers fall under its remit. Most important, all local PLAC secretaries simultaneously lead the local public-security bureau. Small wonder that the artist Ai Weiwei (艾未未) could be detained in secret, Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波) could be sentenced to 11 years in prison for starting a petition and Li Wangyang (李旺陽) could “commit suicide” while in custody.
However, even this monolithic system of control is porous. Had Wang Lijun (王立軍), the former Chongqing police commissioner and a close ally of Bo Xilai, not feared for his life and fled to the US’ consulate in Chengdu, Gu would still be helping Bo in ruling the city.
Wang is no saint. Before he became Bo’s police commissioner, he was the director of the Field Psychology Research Center, where the condemned were executed and their live organs removed.
Given his familiarity with the brutality of the Chinese system, Wang no doubt understood that, after falling out with Gu and Bo, the US consulate might be the only place he could find safety.
After all, when it came to the public-security organs, the courts and the prison system, Gu always had the final say. She acted as her husband’s adviser for cracking down on crime and corruption and was responsible for sending two people — including the PLAC secretary in Wushan County — to prison.
In fact, a few days after killing Heywood, Gu donned a major general’s uniform (which could have belonged to her father, General Gu Jingsheng), convened police officers in Chongqing and falsely claimed that she had received a secret order from the Ministry of Public Security to protect Wang’s personal safety. The uniform, perhaps, was intended to intimidate the Chongqing police.
However, in a strange and unexplained twist, Wang was whisked from the consulate to Beijing, where he presented the Party leadership with the evidence that brought about Bo’s downfall and Gu’s arrest. Revealing the skeletons in Bo’s closet also meant revealing the secret world of the “red aristocracy.” So Wang can expect no leniency at his trial, which will most likely end with a commuted death sentence and forced labor.
In order to protect this red aristocracy, the PLAC made no mention during Gu’s trial of her myriad of economic crimes. In the PLAC’s rewrite of history, Heywood was murdered so that Gu could protect her son, Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜) and Wang did not defend China’s honor by revealing Bo’s and Gu’s criminality, but aired his stories to hostile foreign forces. Only through his punishment can popular indignation be contained.
However, this whole affair may only be a prologue because the only clear truth to emerge is that the party’s leadership is fractured. The wolves are now turning on each other.
Ma Jian is a writer. His most recent novel is Beijing Coma.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs