While discussion of the issue has cooled off somewhat in Taiwan, the East China Sea peace initiative recently proposed by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is still attracting heated discussion in China, Japan and South Korea.
I believe people in Taiwan should carefully discuss the pros and cons of this initiative as well as the ways Taiwan should follow up on the proposal.
First, some people had unrealistic expectations about the proposal, thinking that all sides involved would respond positively to the idea.
A peace initiative merely represents a hope that it can be accepted by the countries concerned. It also implies that further discussion of the issue is needed.
Given Taiwan’s unique geopolitical situation, the muted reaction from the other countries concerned should not come as a surprise.
While reporters have been asking how the US views the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) issue, the US has avoided the topic and instead stressed that all problems should be solved peacefully. They maintain that they have no position on who holds sovereignty over the Diaoyutais.
Although the US seems to favor Japan due to their bilateral military alliance, at least these remarks mark a return to the US’s fuzzy stance on the issue. Regardless of their intentions, the US does seem to take a moderate position.
Japanese Foreign Minister Koichiro Gemba has said that the Senkaku Islands — the Japanese name for the Diaoyutais — are an integral part of Japan, that there is no sovereignty issue and that Japan cannot accept Taiwan’s unilateral suggestions on the issue.
This stance is in direct opposition to Taiwan’s stance on the matter.
In fact, Ma proposed the East China Sea peace initiative based on the premise that the Diaoyutais are auxiliary islands of Taiwan and an integral part of the territory of the Republic of China.
Therefore, Japan’s remarks have no bearing on the sovereignty claims Taiwan has made over the years.
In interpreting the remarks by the Japanese foreign minister, it seems the key aim is to prevent the matter from disrupting the friendly relations between Japan and Taiwan and that cooperation between Taiwan and Japan in the East China Sea is not out of the question.
It is worth noting that Gemba said concrete cooperation was important to peace and stability in the East China Sea.
Some people were inevitably disappointed with Japan’s response, saying they felt it was just diplomatic rhetoric and lacking in sincerity.
However, instead of viewing these remarks as insincere “diplomatese,” I believe the government should use this as an opportunity to carry out diplomatic consultation and demand that Japan engage in talks about fishing industries in Taiwan and Japan.
Alternatively, the government could, at the very least, start negotiations about allowing Taiwanese research ships into the special economic waters.
A look at the way things stand in the East China Sea shows that Japan is in an awkward position.
In the northeast, South Korea claims the Liancourt Rocks — known as Dokdo in Korean and Takeshima in Japanese — while in the south, China is taking a strong line in claiming the Diaoyutais.
Japan has stated that it is willing to submit the Liancourt Rocks dispute to the International Court of Justice (ICJ).
Japan has also not excluded the possibility of submitting the Diaoyutai issue to the ICJ.
However, China has been unwilling to do so and therefore no progress has been made.
It would not hurt Taiwan to take advantage of this chaotic situation and once again formally propose to Japan that the Diaoyutai issue be handed over to a neutral, international judicial body.
If this was accomplished, it should at least prevent the issue from becoming a source of friction in Taiwan-Japan relations.
Taiwan’s diplomatic status complicates the situation significantly.
In the past, Taiwan’s remarks about the disputes over the Diaoyutais and the East China Sea were ignored by all relevant countries.
However, now that Ma’s peace initiative has received a certain level of response, Taiwan needs to strike while the iron is hot and take some timely follow- up action.
If nothing is done, our efforts will be in vain and the international community will once again disregard our sovereignty claims.
While China, Japan and South Korea engage in heated debate, our government does nothing. Its lack of affirmative action is simply incomprehensible.
Chiang Huang-chih is a law professor at National Taiwan University
Translated by Drew Cameron
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under