The 2012 London Olympic Games are over, and China has once again confirmed its status as a great sporting nation. It is quite informative to see how China obtained this status and the role sports plays in Chinese politics.
In the 1980s, when China first embarked on its market reforms, it lacked confidence in its dealings with other countries. The government realized the country needed a taste of success.
Realizing the potential sports held, the government mobilized considerable human and material resources, putting the propaganda machine into top gear and pushing the national appetite for sports to fever pitch. Its efforts to encourage the development of sports paid off, and winning gave the Chinese people a real sense of pride in their achievements, reinforcing national cohesiveness. Those who were successful in competitions were publicly lauded, sometimes even regarded as national heroes. The flip side was that the less successful competitors returned home to a cold reception.
At the time, the political imperative was expressed in slogans calling for the reinvigoration of “Mother China,” and the national fervor for sport was born as much from the emotional needs of the people as from the government’s political needs. Wu Shaozu (伍紹祖), director-general of the Chinese General Administration of Sports from 1988 to 2000, has commented on how, when China first embarked on its reforms, it was trailing quite far behind more advanced nations, and needed something in which it could perform well, for the sake of both the state and the public. For this reason, he said, the value of gold medals far exceeded the significance they entailed purely in sporting terms because they came to represent the success of the Chinese people.
The real significance of national sport extended beyond political cohesion for the government: The political implications ran much deeper. The image of sport conjured by the orchestrated, synchronized dance performances, which formed the core of the Beijing Olympics opening ceremony, has subtly influenced the Chinese national psyche. This image is one of falling in line with the group, of order, structure and synchronicity, all of which are beneficial to the prevailing political ideology. The mass exercise sessions with instructions hailed out over loudspeakers, which were once popular in China, are a classic example.
The essayist Zhu Dake (朱大可) has written on the cultural relevance of these mass exercise sessions, identifying three aspects pertinent to politics. First, they are a collective activity, for which people are called together; second, each participant is expected to perform identical actions; and finally, they involve the unquestioned obedience to the relayed instructions.
“The nature of these exercise sessions has remained the same from their inception until the present day. They involve the coming together of large numbers of individuals to engage in absolutely identical movements. Their purpose is to achieve a unity of purpose in the participants and forge a spirit of collectivism. However, the time of collective activity, with everyone keeping in perfect step with each other, should have been consigned to history quite some time ago,” Zhu said.
Sport is about national influence — a manifestation of soft power.
However, in China it has become a byword for official ideology. The excessive preoccupation with sporting achievement is about overcoming the national inferiority complex. This lay right at the heart of the Olympics for the Chinese.
Wang Dan is a visiting associate professor at National Tsing Hua University’s College of Humanities and Social Sciences.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry