Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has said “No” to the West so many times over Syria that he may come to rival a Cold War predecessor for the title of “Mr Nyet.”
The chain-smoking, battle-hardened diplomat is proving every bit as formidable as the long-serving former Soviet foreign minister Andrei Gromyko as Moscow holds out against a US-led push for new sanctions on Syria and the removal of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
Lavrov is the cause of much hand-wringing and frustration in the West, where his country’s policies are seen as an obstacle to ending the bloodshed in Syria.
However, he has won plaudits in Russia for his stubborn defense of Moscow’s position. For hawkish Russian President Vladimir Putin, back in the Kremlin after a four-year absence, he is the right person in the right place at the right time.
At 62, the former UN ambassador seems to be relishing the challenge. Long accustomed to criticism, Lavrov has made an art of stonewall diplomacy and shrugs off each new attack on Russia’s position on Syria by simply restating policy.
“It’s a diplomatic game for Sergei Lavrov,” Russia in Global Affairs editor Fyodor Lukyanov said.
Anyone who doubted Lavrov’s stubbornness before the conflict in Syria should look back to 2003, when he defied attempts by then-UN secretary-general Kofi Annan to impose a smoking ban at the UN headquarters in New York.
Lavrov carried on smoking, saying Annan “doesn’t own this building.”
Described by both admirers and rivals as highly professional and a tough negotiator, he also has a sharp tongue.
Annan said he “learned to appreciate both his wisdom and his wit.”
In nearly a decade as Moscow’s UN envoy — a post also held by Gromyko before becoming foreign minister in Soviet times — Lavrov won a reputation for digging in his heels.
It was there he honed his skills in the cut-and-thrust of diplomacy that would at times be used later to antagonize rivals or partners who saw the world differently, including former US secretary of state Condoleezza Rice.
Glenn Kessler, a veteran journalist and member of the Council on Foreign Relations, a US think tank, described him as “a showman who doesn’t hesitate to use a diplomatic stiletto.”
Of his relationship with Rice: he knew how to “push her buttons,” Kessler said.
Lavrov’s expertise and reputation as a strong negotiator made him a natural choice for Putin when the president sought to replace former Russian foreign minister Igor Ivanov in July 2004.
INFLUENTIAL
Although Putin is in charge of foreign policy as head of state, Russian experts say Lavrov is more than just an executor of policies dictated to him by the Kremlin.
“There’s no one to touch him in terms of professionalism and as a communicator,” said Vladimir Frolov, the former director of the National Laboratory for Foreign Policy think tank, who is now head of a communication company called LEFF Group.
“His independence depends on the issue. On Syria he is clearly very influential. He’s pretty much the driver of policy and he can claim with some credibility that he’s pulled Russia back into the center of international decisionmaking,” Frolov said.
In the West, he and his country are assailed for blocking calls for al-Assad to leave power. When Annan quit as special envoy for Syria on Thursday last week, he complained of “finger-pointing and name-calling in the [UN] Security Council” and a lack of will for peace among the protagonists.
US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton vented her frustration last month, saying Russia and China would “pay a price” for using their UN Security Council veto power to help keep the Syrian leader in power. Lavrov’s unsmiling response was simply to restate Russia’s position, underlining that its policy was not shaped around keeping any individual in power and suggesting Moscow was being subjected to blackmail to force it to change its position.
Moscow’s stance is shaped partly by hard-nosed interests. Russia has a naval maintenance facility in Syria and sells arms to Damascus. It wants to keep a foothold in the Middle East.
However, its battle is also ideological: Russia wants to halt what it sees as a Western drive to use the UN to topple leaders the West dislikes. There is no doubt Lavrov supports Moscow’s policy on this wholeheartedly.
Putin’s return to the Kremlin in May also appears to suit Lavrov, who kept his job when the relatively liberal Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev was elected president in 2008 after Putin was barred by the Russian Constitution from seeking a third straight term.
A senior Moscow-based diplomat said Lavrov had a “much greater voice” in the government since Putin’s return to the presidency and that “the real Lavrov” was back.
Lavrov, a career diplomat whose first posting was to Sri Lanka, will not stay in office as long as Gromyko, who was Soviet foreign minister for 28 years and earned the nickname Mr Nyet for blocking Western moves at the UN.
SURVIVOR
Yet Lavrov, who is said by diplomatic sources to respect Gromyko, has shown he is a political survivor by keeping his job for eight years, despite talk of rivalry between him and Kremlin foreign policy adviser Sergei Prikhodko.
A member of the United Russia party that was led until recently by Putin, he is a pragmatist and has survived partly by presenting himself as a professional diplomat and avoiding playing any overt role in domestic politics.
Lavrov, who speaks English, French and Sinhalese, has come through repeated crises, defending Moscow’s policies just as firmly on issues such as democracy and human rights as on the 2008 war with Georgia and wars with rebel Chechnya.
It has not always been easy. When serving at the UN headquarters under former Russian president Boris Yeltsin, whose grip on power was often weaker than Putin’s, Lavrov sometimes had to endure a frustrating wait for instructions.
Once when he told fellow UN Security Council representatives that he was waiting for instructions from the government, he was heard mumbling: “That is, if I have a government.”
When Russia was pressing for sanctions to be eased on Iraq, a US official in a closed UN Security Council session told Lavrov that this would be like “approving a restaurant with cockroaches in the soup.”
According to diplomatic sources, Lavrov answered: “We are not asking you to give Iraq five stars. We only want you to say that it is Kentucky Fried Chicken.”
On one occasion, he was reported by a British newspaper to have lost his cool by swearing at then-British foreign secretary David Miliband during a telephone call on the Georgia war.
The British Foreign Ministry denied the report.
Lavrov said he had quoted a European colleague who had referred to Georgia’s leader as a “fucking lunatic.”
Lavrov, who is married with one daughter, likes to relax by white-water rafting with old friends once a year, plays the guitar and has written poetry, as well as the anthem of the elite foreign relations institute in Moscow where he studied.
He does not suffer fools.
If he loses patience, he will ask: “What are you talking about?”
If he does not want to speak to reporters, he pins his cellphone to his ear.
“He reached for a Marlboro whenever he could and enjoyed a glass of Scotch whisky,” said Evelyn Leopold, who covered him for years as a Reuters UN correspondent.
Whatever Annan says, Lavrov will smoke if he wants to.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs