Love, sincerity and politics
After recently observing on television the words and deeds of major political figures in Taiwan, I have come to doubt their value systems. It appears that politicians value only money, status, fame, power and narrow political interests.
1 Corinthians 13:1-2 in the Bible reads: “If I speak human or angels’ languages but do not have love, I am a sounding gong or a clanging cymbal. If I have the gift of prophesy, and understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have all faith so that I can move mountains but do not have love, I am nothing.”
One day, former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) acting chairperson Chen Chu (陳菊), who is also Kaohsiung mayor, discussed visiting former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁). She indicated that she cared about him.
However, people have different ways of showing concern. There is little value in judging the way a person demonstrates concern. What is more important is whether they have love in their hearts. I want to ask Chen Chu — does her concern for the former president come from sincere love?
DPP Chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) visited Chen Shui-bian in jail before the party chairman’s election. I cannot conclude whether he is sincere in his love for the former president, but his visit did involve some careful political considerations.
Before his visit, I published an article in a newspaper referring to Chen Shui-bian’s case as a political issue, not a legal issue. All Taiwanese should regard the incarceration of the former president as their own experience and should share his pain, humiliation and suffering.
After this article was published, Su reacted, visiting Chen Shui-bian the next afternoon. I was very moved. However, Su refused to sign a petition calling for Chen Shui-bian’s “medical parole.”
At the time of his refusal, Su said: “Doing is more important than saying.”
This petition is a simple act taken in a pure frame of mind. I believe if a person truly loves Taiwan, he or she should be involved in this petition. I challenge Su to tell us Taiwanese why he refused to participate in this petition.
Another political figure, former DPP chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), taught her university students to cultivate a spirit of competition. However, in my old-fashioned value system, it is better to encourage students to study hard, to enrich themselves and then to share their experiences with others.
I suggest that some values from Japan be absorbed. I am not saying everything from Japan is good, but there are some virtues from Japan that I think Taiwan could learn from. Before World War II, I was educated in Japan and I am very grateful that I had this opportunity. The school mottoes of the Japan Women’s University, founded by renowned Japanese educator Jinzo Naruse were “thorough conviction, spontaneous creation” and “joint service.” What these mottoes stress is the act of maintaining faith without depending on others, pursuing your own life and helping others. Jinzo Naruse taught us to sacrifice ourselves to help others, to love our country and to adhere to our principles.
His teachings have spiritually sustained me my whole life. In addition to the love of Christ, these teachings have allowed me to live a valuable and meaningful life filled with gratitude and noble values.
Education in Taiwan today is polluted by money, status, fame, power, special interests and selfishness. These qualities create people who are selfish, prone to flattery and lack a sense of justice. These qualities have also resulted in the huge mess that is modern-day Taiwan.
I believe that the value system that present-day Taiwanese carry will decide the nation’s fate. Only if Taiwanese can insulate themselves from the bad education of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) will they be able to uphold their dignity.
In this way, I want to speak out, and to encourage Taiwanese to study 1 Corinthians in the Bible to seek the true meaning of love. We should not limit ourselves to only sing the song of “true love,” but should learn how to truly love, to live a valuable and meaningful life.
Yang Liu Hsiu-Hua
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry