Republican US presidential candidate Mitt Romney upset Londoners, Palestinians and US journalists on his ill-fated tour abroad, but with voters focused on the economy at home, it is unclear whether his fumbles will have a lasting effect on the Nov. 6 election.
Romney is facing doubts about whether he can handle himself on the world stage as he tries to replace US President Barack Obama.
His blunt comments on the London Olympics, Israel’s culture and the status of Jerusalem showed an awkward tone and an inability to control his own message, a problem that could be magnified in the heat of the campaign’s next 100 days.
Yet US voters, especially in Rust Belt swing states like Ohio and Pennsylvania, care more about jobs than Jerusalem. It is not certain that Romney will pay at the ballot box for his fumbles.
“I don’t think this will have a lasting impact one way or the other,” said David Yepsen, director of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute at Southern Illinois University. “It’s certainly not going to help his goal of burnishing his foreign policy credentials. I don’t think he did that, but I don’t think he hurt himself either.”
The trip ended on a sour note with the media on Tuesday when traveling Romney press secretary Rick Gorka angrily admonished reporters for shouting questions about his gaffes to Romney at a memorial to the late Pope John Paul II in Poland.
“Kiss my ass. This is a holy site for the Polish people. Show some respect,” Gorka said.
A saving grace for Romney may be that his sojourn took place during a summer down period with Americans more interested in their vacations and the Olympic Games than the presidential campaign.
As the US winds down its foreign wars and frets about its debt, deficit and high jobless number of more than 8 percent, voters are paying little attention to global matters.
Fewer than 10 percent of people surveyed in regular polls by Reuters/Ipsos over the last 21 months have named foreign affairs as the biggest problem facing the US.
The number fell to 5 percent in the last poll in April, compared with 46 percent who mentioned the economy.
Still, images like Romney being rebuked by British Prime Minister David Cameron for doubting London’s Olympic readiness, do not help the former Massachusetts governor convince Americans he is ready for the White House.
“It is clear that the opportunity to credential his beliefs with the American voters was nothing short for Mitt Romney of an embarrassing disaster on this trip. So, the notion somehow that this trip and its impacts don’t matter, I think is one of the craziest things that has been said along the course of this trip,” Obama campaign adviser Robert Gibbs said.
Romney has more of a need to be careful about voters’ perceptions of him than Obama does because Americans are still making their minds up about the Republican. Roughly one in five voters does not have an opinion yet about Romney.
“Romney has an opportunity to change views of him to a larger extent than does the president. There are a large number of people who are still not decided what they think about Romney. Virtually everybody has an opinion of what they think of the president,” said Peter Brown, of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute.
Romney’s advisers had debated whether he should leave the US at all at a critical moment of the campaign when he is running nearly even with Obama in polls by pounding a relentless message that the US economy under the Democratic incumbent has been a failure.
Taking him out of the country for a week effectively muzzled Romney from this message.
On Tuesday, he waved off criticism of his comments about the economies and cultures of Israel and the Palestinians, which he made in Jerusalem at a fund-raising breakfast that raised more than US$1 million from a crowd of mostly Jewish-Americans.
“I’m not speaking about it, did not speak about the Palestinian culture or the decisions made in their economy. That’s an interesting topic that deserves scholarly analysis, but I actually didn’t address that — certainly don’t intend to address that in my campaign,” he told Fox News.
Romney’s missteps exposed some weaknesses in his campaign. After controversy swirled around him for days, it was only on Tuesday that the campaign produced a sustained response, when it sent senior strategist Stuart Stevens to talk to reporters.
“I think this trip was a great success,” he said, riding in a motorcade vehicle with several reporters as Romney went to a wreath-laying ceremony at a Warsaw monument.
Republicans pointed to Romney’s unabashed support for Israel as having the potential to peel some Jewish-Americans away from Obama — particularly in swing state Florida — and energize evangelical Christians who have had doubts about whether Romney is conservative enough.
“There were some unforced errors, but no lasting damage,” Republican strategist Mark McKinnon said. “And he solidified his Jewish base.”
In a week when Newsweek magazine asked on its cover if he was too much of a “wimp” to be president, Romney objected to news media coverage of his gaffes and portrayed himself as dealing with major global issues head on.
“I realize that there will be some ... who are far more interested in finding something to write about that is unrelated to the economy, to geopolitics, to the threat of war, to the reality of conflict in Afghanistan today, to nuclearization of Iran,” Romney told Fox News.
Additional reporting by Sam Jacobs in Washington and Eric Johnson in Chicago
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry