Gently, but firmly, the new commander of US forces in the Pacific has urged the South Koreans and Japanese to find a way to get past the demons of their history to forge a new and productive security posture.
Commander of the US Pacific Command Admiral Samuel Locklear, who assumed command in March, encouraged the governments in Seoul and Tokyo “to find a way past the political divide that stops them from recognizing the importance of information-sharing as it relates to the security environment.”
In an interview with several US reporters the admiral said he and Pacific Command should ensure that the South Korean and Japanese governments, both treaty allies of the US, “are aware of the military imperative of information sharing and working together if you want to build a productive security environment.”
Locklear had been asked what he and the US Pacific Command could do about the longstanding Korean-Japanese hostility that made relations between the two perhaps the weakest link in the US’ security stance in Asia. Earlier this month, the South Korean and Japanese governments negotiated an agreement to exchange information on issues such as the threat from North Korea. However, just before the pact was to be signed, virulent anti-Japanese protests erupted in Seoul and the signing was called off.
The bad blood between Korea and Japan is often attributed to the latter’s oppressive occupation of the former for 35 years, which ended with Japan’s surrender in World War II in 1945. However, the antagonism seems deeper than that. Now, 67 years later, anti-Japanese sentiment in South Korea appears to be stronger than fear of North Korea.
South Koreans seem envious of Japan’s economic, industrial and technological success and in schools, museums and historical sites, antagonism against Japan is relentlessly nurtured.
For their part, Japanese often seem insensitive to South Korean laments and have sometimes engaged in what can only be labeled clumsy diplomacy. Occasionally, right-wingers and nationalists contend that Korea benefited from Japanese rule and justify Japan’s imperial expansion as normal for that era of Western colonialism in Asia.
Some Americans with experience in Asia say that the US should insist that Japan and South Korea settle their differences for the sake of mutual security.
Michael McDevitt, a retired rear admiral, wrote several years ago that “the United States has invested little effort over the past decade in pressing both of its allies to overcome the past.”
Admiral Locklear sought to be optimistic: “I think we are seeing opportunities for them [South Korea and Japan] to be more closely aligned with each other. To some degree, economics will push them closer together. Security issues in the region will push them closer together. Many [in both nations] are concerned about North Korea and nuclear proliferation.”
For more than a decade, North Korea has been developing nuclear arms and has shown no sign of stopping.
Those nuclear weapons “will force them to get closer together,” the admiral said.
In addition, China and Russia have nuclear weapons aimed at Northeast Asia. The US has pledged to South Korea and Japan that the US nuclear umbrella extends over both nations. North Korea has also been attempting to develop long- range missiles to carry nuclear warheads.
Asked whether North Korea had built a missile that could hit Hawaii, 7,400km away, the admiral said: “They have not yet demonstrated that capability.”
However, Locklear suggested that his command was watching Pyongyang’s program intently.
“Homeland defense is my No. 1 mission,” he said.
Richard Halloran is a commentator in Hawaii.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations