In anticipation of the 2012 Olympic Games in London, the Regent Street Association hoisted the flags of all the countries scheduled to attend the Games, including that of the Republic of China (ROC), along Regent Street, one of the busiest and most famous shopping streets in the British capital.
However, this simple welcoming gesture triggered strong objections from China. Finally, bowing to political pressure, the association took the ROC flag down.
On the face of it, China seems to have won the day.
However, this rather crude behavior has gained Taiwan more international sympathy, as well as free publicity for the nation’s cause.
When the incident was reported in British and European newspapers and online, people from different nations were largely supportive of Taiwan’s case.
The BBC initially displayed the ROC flag for Taiwan on the Olympic section of its news Web site, although it did eventually replace it with the flag for “Chinese Taipei.”
Without a doubt, China has avoided losing face in this particular case, but at what cost?
For the sake of its pride, China has sacrificed a large amount of the goodwill that exists between Taiwan and China, breeding more resentment among Taiwanese. At the same time, Beijing has shown the international community what lies behind its facade.
Taiwan is just a small country and the odds are good that the majority of people living outside of Taiwan would not have been able to pick out the ROC flag from the other lesser-known national flags flown in Regent Street. If it had been left flying undisturbed above London’s bustling Regent Street, hardly anyone would have noticed it.
However, thanks to China’s protestations, the ROC flag was displayed in a multitude of foreign media outlets and now a larger number of people are aware of what it looks like.
The important point is that the more China pressures Taiwan regarding its international status, the more people in other countries will feel that it is not appropriate for Beijing to do so.
I once had a conversation on this topic with a cab driver from Cambridge when I was on a trip to the UK. He was a refined-looking English gent who told me that he did not believe many educated British people actually believe Taiwan is a part of China. I have heard similar sentiments many times before from foreigners I have spoken to.
While it is true that China’s approach on this issue will, for the time being at least, make the governments of different countries around the world, purely out of a concern for political repercussions, play ball with China, it is quite clear that it will not win the argument on the streets and in the bars of these countries.
A recent opinion poll showed that as much as 80 percent of Taiwanese do not believe that unification with China is necessary. This suggests that Taiwanese do not strongly identify with China, or even have a favorable impression of it.
It is unfortunate that the Chinese authorities, so sure of their own intelligence, do not seem to be aware of this rather gaping hole in their plan. Instead they just continue to use these rather unwelcome methods in their treatment of people they refer to as “Taiwanese compatriots.”
Should the Chinese authorities continue along this path, the antipathy Taiwanese feel toward China is only going to get stronger.
Hsu Yu-fang is a professor of Sinophone literature at National Dong HwaUniversity.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry