From top to bottom, the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) leaders appear to be deeply afraid of the possibility that the public will soon realize who and what they really are and what they really stand for. Yet, it seems, they have done their very best in the recent past to put their innate authoritarian arrogance and structural corruption on full public display.
The top echelons within the party are meddling in high-school textbook content — partly by deleting historical facts referring to the Japanese colonial era and partly by returning to the colonial-style brainwashing of students over Taiwanese history. President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is using the Republic of China Constitution — one that was forced on the people of Taiwan — as an excuse, saying that school textbooks must be written “in accordance with the Constitution.”
The Ministry of Education is playing down these “imperial decrees,” saying that this is all just “a reflection of what the public wants.” However, the only reason they are taking such an arrogant and domineering attitude to these issues is because the KMT won the last election.
However, reinstating colonial education was not one of Ma’s election promises. Instead, he relies on lower-level leaders who are carrying the party forward by not questioning policies and whose only concerns are getting their hands on more cash and further fattening themselves.
This juxtaposition highlights the contradictions between the high and low levels in the KMT. Lower-level leaders who carry the whole party machine are enriching themselves and spend their efforts promoting the party’s electoral prospects, while the higher leaders who are carried on their shoulders are using the Constitution as a weapon to threaten the public.
The fact that someone talked about “the going rate” in connection to what former Executive Yuan secretary-general Lin Yi-shih (林益世) allegedly asked for in order to provide his “lobbying” services implies that this is not an isolated case. The Lin case also allegedly involves Vice President Wu Den-yih’s (吳敦義) key local election workers, sisters and local gang leaders, who all seem to have profited from their connections by functioning as go-betweens and then earning “commissions.” This is all symptomatic of universal and structurally ingrained corruption.
Common people work their whole lives and their pension payments are still not enough to pay the “commission” required by a go-between. A dentist in the US charges US$100 to extract one tooth; Lin, a dentist by profession, would have had to pull out 19,300 teeth to earn the equivalent of the US$1.93 million he has reportedly admitted to taking in bribes.
To the people involved in the Lin corruption case making money was apparently as easy as pie; they apparently had so much of it, in fact, that they had to burn it and flush it down the toilet when they were found out. That does not mean that they necessarily supported the top KMT leaders’ attempts to sell out Taiwan — all they cared about was continuing to help the party win elections allowing them another chance to earn extra “commission.” Ma, on the other hand, who claims to detest the connections to these factions and their corrupt practices, is not above relying on them to win his elections. Ma wants power, they want money.
To paraphrase an old Taiwanese saying that well describes the corruption within the KMT: “It’s all about using your connections. With the right connections, you won’t have a problem.”
James Wang is a political commentator in Taipei.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs