Free speech has many forms
The Ministry of Culture has banned the public exhibition of a film poster because it looks horrible and may scare children (“Film poster ban decision challenged,” July 19, page 5).
Movie posters are considered speech for the purposes of commerce and are protected by the Constitution. Freedom of speech shall not be restricted unless in certain circumstances set forth in the Constitution. Restricting freedom of speech has clear standards set by law or by regulations promulgated under the law, and the restriction must be appropriate in the given context.
The Ministry of Culture cited the provisions of the Motion Picture Act (電影法) and “related laws and regulations” as its legal basis for banning the poster. The act requires advertisement materials to be submitted for review and approval before they are used.
However, the same law does not provide the standards of review. In the Enforcement Rules of the Motion Picture Act, only one provision sets forth the standards for advertisement materials, which stipulates that they must correspond to the movie classification category for “general audiences.” Motion picture classification is further governed by the Regulations Governing the Classification of Motion Pictures. Whether the provision of the Enforcement Rules exceeds the authority of the Motion Picture Act and thereby makes the restriction unconstitutional can be left to the courts.
Assuming that classification of motion pictures and advance review of advertisement materials serve legitimate purposes, when applying the movie classification to advertisement materials, the competent authority should be cautious not to overly restrict the freedom of speech.
Advertisement materials are not the same as the motion picture itself, as they are often without a complete sequence of events, audio and visual effects, etc — particularly those in a still form taken out of context, such as a poster. Advertising tools by their very nature must reflect some content of the motion picture; otherwise it fails to fulfill its promotional function and could even be construed as false advertisement.
As long as the motion picture itself is properly classified, the competent authority has done its job to protect those intended to be protected by such a system. As for the advertisement medium, unless it is indisputably unsuitable for a “general audience,” as long as there is room for interpretation, the competent authority should apply a more lenient standard.
Finally, the purpose of establishing the Ministry of Culture, as stipulated in its Organization Act (組織法), is to promote the development of culture, which inherently includes encouraging cultural diversity, rather than to assume the role of people’s guardian. People can protect themselves from advertisement materials they dislike, and parents can protect their kids from content they disapprove of. As for the youngsters in need of, but lacking, “protection,” it is not the duty of the Ministry of Culture to provide this function. The ministry is evidently misunderstanding its role.
C.C. Kuo
Taipei
Selective spotlighting
The Taipei Times is correct to urge President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) to go beyond lip service to protect human rights (Editorial, July 19, page 8).
However, the editorial failed to acknowledge several misdeeds of the Ma administration regarding human rights.
For example, the blatant neglect of the wave of self-immolations of Tibetan monks, the refusal to grant a visa to Rebiya Kadeer, the Uighur activist, under the pretext of “terrorism,” and most recently, the unlawful detention by the Chinese government of Taiwanese citizen and Falun Gong practitioner Bruce Chung (鍾鼎邦).
Failing to gain Ma’s assistance, Chung’s family turned to the chairwoman of the US House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee Ileana Ros-Lehtinen for help.
The Ma administration has turned a blind eye to all of these human rights violations, yet your editorial only singled out the imprisonment of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁). This narrow focus is not only misleading, but calls into question the Taipei Times’ stance on human rights.
Independent and transparent journalism is vital to democracy and the protection of human rights. By singling out only one person — who happens to be an ex-Democratic Progressive Party chairperson and a former president — and neglecting the other glaring cases, it seems the Taipei Times has (inadvertently) taken a political side and compromised its journalistic integrity.
I sincerely hope the Taipei Times will consider amending this editorial to pay equal attention to other pressing issues of human rights in Taiwan and globally.
Tiffany Hsiao
Rockville, Maryland
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry