The Agency Against Corruption (AAC) turns one year old today and is celebrating the moment by hosting a running event at the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall. One hopes there is no significance in the agency encouraging people to run.
There is certainly no link between the agency’s goals and hosting this type of sporting event, as many critics have pointed out. They would like to see something like a score card of the agency’s achievements so far. The agency would not likely rack up a great total, given that the biggest corruption scandal in recent years only came to light after one of those allegedly involved in the corruption went to the media, leaving the agency looking clueless.
So, what exactly has the agency achieved?
In August last year, it made headlines after legislators accused it of targeting them for carrying out their duty to lobby on behalf of their constituents. Little more was heard on this front. The agency also launched an investigation of the director of the Keelung Customs Office along with six customs officials on suspicion of profiteering.
In November, it arrested two National Palace Museum employees on suspicion of stealing digital images of museum artifacts and selling them to Chinese companies.
Then, in May, it announced an investigation into a 2007 public bid that Taiwan Power Co held for the construction of parts of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in Gongliao District (貢寮), New Taipei City (新北市), that possibly violated the Government Procurement Act (政府採購法).
Later that month it arrested 10 police officers from different units on suspicion of fabricating documents for car accidents to defraud insurance companies.
The agency also drew complaints after it distributed a pamphlet to public school teachers that included a warning not to attend graduation banquets over concerns that a conflict of interest could emerge.
Last month it said Chu Shao-hua (朱少華), then-chairman of state-run oil refiner CPC Corp, Taiwan, was being investigated for corruption over a suspicious relationship with a private contractor. A few days later, the Ministry of Economic Affairs said Chu was retiring at the end of the month.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) announced the formation of the agency last year after a major scandal involving several High Court judges shook the public’s confidence in the judiciary and finally forced both Ma’s and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) hands after years of blocking previous attempts to establish such an institution. Ma maintained that the very formation of the agency would help deter public servants from engaging in corrupt activities. Unfortunately, he was not being fatuous.
However, since the agency does not have the authority to carry out investigations against senior government bureaus or officials and because it falls under the purview of the Ministry of Justice, there have been many concerns that it would not be as effective as Hong Kong’s Independent Commission Against Corruption, or Singapore’s Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau. There were also fears that the agency would simply become, as one commentator put it, the “AADPPC,” or the Agency Against Democratic Progressive Party Corruption.
Luckily, that has not proven to be the case, but the scandal involving former Executive Yuan secretary-general Lin Yi-shih (林益世) highlights the gaps in the agency’s brief.
After each major corruption scandal, Ma and his team — and the rest of the nation — have expressed shock and horror, but then went back to business as usual. The agency needs more teeth and if the Executive Yuan is not willing to add them, then legislators must take it upon themselves to do so. It is not possible to completely eliminate corruption, but a stronger agency could do a better job of digging up dirt and cleaning up the government. The nation deserves nothing less.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry