The balance of power in East Asia is a tenuous thing, and can be tipped in an uncontrollable direction in various ways if the players involved are not careful. This is why Japanese Diet members told visiting Taiwanese lawmakers that they should not sidle up so close to the People’s Republic of China after a recent dispute over the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), which Taiwan, Japan and China all claim, and which ended up taking an ominous twist.
Currently, East Asia, especially the countries on the Pacific Rim, is experiencing an era of almost unprecedented peace. No major wars, neither land nor sea, have unsettled this conflict-free period in more than three decades. This state of affairs has allowed one of the fastest and deepest economic expansions of any region in world history. Where 40 years ago this region was characterized by rural, agrarian societies with bloody rebellions going on everywhere and revolutionary movements ripping cultures apart, today there are Starbucks outlets and 7-Elevens on street corners in all major cities in the area and the region has become the world’s factory.
There is a lot to lose and playing around with the balance of power is not something that should be done lightly. Japan knows this from its drastic experience prior to and during World War II. Imperial Japan tipped the scales in the late 1930s, and paid the price.
The situation now is even more dynamic, and potentially more explosive, than it was back then. In the 1930s, the center of world economic power was in Europe. Now, the world’s second-biggest and third-biggest — China and Japan respectively — economies are in Asia. China fields one of the world’s largest militaries and it is becoming increasingly advanced. Japan also has the potential to throw its weight around, despite its pacifist constitution.
On the peripheries of both of these countries are smaller but very powerful players — Taiwan, South Korea, Vietnam, Singapore. If the military balance were to be tipped out of whack, ASEAN could get involved, and the US military, which has bases and interests everywhere, would be sure to throw its weight into the ring.
The intricacies of this military balance are profound and all-encompassing. It is a bad idea for Taiwan, under the leadership of the President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) administration, to trample on the military balance by cozying up too much to a country that has hitherto been Taiwan’s enemy.
In a luncheon with Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party representatives Yoshitaka Shindo and Hakubun Shimomura, as well as Democratic Party of Japan representative Shozo Azuma — all major players in Japanese politics — the visiting Taiwanese legislators were told that Taiwan should not venture overly close to China to maintain the balance of power. This veiled warning came shortly after Coast Guard Administration ships escorted a fishing vessel carrying Chunghua Baodiao Alliance activists to within eyeshot of the Diaoyutais, several of which Japan administers. In a provocative twist to the event, one of the Baodao members unfurled a People’s Republic of China flag as his boat was being escorted by coats guard vessels from Taiwan flying the Republic of China flag and as a Japanese coast guard vessel confronted them.
The flag incident could send a signal that Taiwan is now in the China camp, which would be a major shift in the region’s strategic alliance and would effectively transform the balance of power if it were true.
It is no surprise that Japanese Diet members took it seriously and are worried about the state of strategic relations in the region.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry