The KMT’s money laundering
Classic money laundering involves turning ill-gotten gains into clean assets.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), including President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), previously acknowledged that the KMT’s tens or hundreds of billions of dollars in assets were essentially ill-gotten and Ma pledged in 2005 to take care of the problem, something he as chairman of the KMT has yet to do.
Unfortunately, Ma’s idea of taking care of ill-gotten gains means selling the assets and using the proceeds for the party’s purposes, not returning the assets to the rightful owners, the Taiwanese. Getting cash for stolen property is not taking care of the problem. Moreover, sales of stolen property are void, given the knowledge of the buyers of the nature of the assets.
Some KMT faithful like to argue the assets rightfully belong to the party, but it is the party’s failure to distinguish between the KMT and the Republic of China that got us here in the first place. For Ma, and for the KMT, “of the people, by the people and for the people” means “we the KMT,” and it always has and always will.
Ma’s handling of the KMT assets appears to be classic money laundering under any definition. All assets should have been placed in trust, sold neutrally for fair value and the proceeds returned to the public treasury.
Having instead apparently given the tens or hundreds of billions of dollars in proceeds from these stolen assets to the KMT, Ma and the party may be guilty of money laundering, and they may continue to be guilty of such crimes each and every day those assets remain under the management of the party.
It is not necessary to investigate whether those responsible today were involved in acquiring (or stealing, as it were) the assets in the first place, but only the hiding, management, sale and application of the proceeds of the purportedly stolen property.
Such legal charges and prosecutions against former dictators, their families and cohorts are common after the fall of tyranny, but in Taiwan, the KMT still controls much of the legal apparatus that would be called into action to proceed with such prosecution.
Tyranny for the most part ended with elections, but it continues in some other respects. It is important for the development of Taiwan’s democratic government for this chapter in the nation’s history to be adjudicated and closed, otherwise there will always be questions about whether Taiwan continues to be occupied by the KMT.
The exact disposition of each and every KMT asset and the proceeds must be disclosed in full to the public and a determination made of who is responsible for this alleged laundering of the assets and diverting of the proceeds from the public treasury. That means minutes and notes of meetings, hours of questioning of those involved, reviews of notes, transactions, e-mails and other such evidence. If the facts show that Ma and his KMT cohorts are responsible for directing the disposition and management of these ill-gotten assets, they should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, just as the previous administration was subjected to such scrutiny.
It would be hard for Ma to avoid taking responsibility for the ultimate decision to dispose of any asset and the application of billions of dollars of proceeds.
Why has there been no investigation and indictment to date? Who in Taiwan has the power and neutrality to faithfully and accurately investigate this case? Where is the neutral prosecution? When will justice be done?
Lee Long-hwa,
New York
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China