As global casino operators have built casino resorts in Macau and Singapore to help boost the cities’ tourism and gaming industries, Taiwan passed an amendment to the Offshore Islands Development Act (離島建設條例) in January 2009, which allowed the establishment of casinos on its outlying islands of Kinmen, Matsu and Penghu if more than 50 percent of voters in a local referendum agree.
In September of that year, Penghu held the nation’s first referendum on gambling, but its residents voted against building a casino resort. While the Penghu islands are short of money for improving infrastructure and often suffer from unstable supplies of water and electricity, about 56 percent of voters expressed concerns over the negative social effects of gambling.
Three years later, residents of Matsu showed a totally different attitude toward the casino resorts initiative. In a local referendum held on July 7, about 56 percent of voters voted in favor of a plan to build casinos there, versus 42 percent who opposed it.
The results of the Matsu referendum have raised questions in Taiwan and overseas about its possible social and economic implications. It also invites speculation over whether Penghu would hold a similar referendum again and whether other regions in Taiwan would follow suit.
Actually, Matsu lacks everything it needs to develop its tourism business: It does not have sufficient water and electricity supplies, its ports are small and it lacks a large airport to welcome guests. The referendum results suggest Matsu residents’ strong demand for infrastructure projects, which they otherwise cannot get from the central government. It also indicates residents’ hopes for jobs and wealth if casino resorts were to be developed there.
Whether or not Matsu becomes the “Mediterranean of Asia” as the casino developer, Weidner Resorts Taiwan, has vowed, neither the local nor the central government is yet ready for such a plan, which means the casino resorts will not be completed for at least several years.
This is for several reasons. First, no one can be sure when the government will pass gambling legislation and start issuing gambling licenses to potential operators; second, Weidner Resorts Taiwan will have to win the bid for the development project once the legislature gives its go-ahead, so its promises to local residents at this stage are simply castles in the air. Third, the Matsu casino plan has its eyes on Chinese gamblers in particular, but this strategy faces uncertainties under the current political situation across the Taiwan Strait and it depends on China further opening the door for its citizens to visit Taiwan’s outlying islands.
More importantly, legalizing gambling is still a controversial moral issue in Taiwan and the current focus in Matsu is mainly on casinos, rather than resorts, whereas the same issue in other Asian cities has clearly shifted from the moral debate to the objective cost-benefit analysis of how to develop more comprehensive leisure resorts and gaming industries there. As long as the Democratic Progressive Party maintains its anti-gambling stance and casino opponents’ worries about criminal activity and social order remain, legalized gambling in Taiwan will still have a long way to go for Matsu and other outlying islands.
Nevertheless, what Taiwan’s outlying islands need is a way to improve their overall tourism environments. Without attractions to attract tourists, these outlying islands will never become developed, even if they do have casinos. This also suggests that what Weidner Resorts Taiwan has promised to Matsu residents — a monthly subsidy of between NT$18,000 and NT$80,000 if the casino hits revenue targets — will end up bouncing just like a rubber check.
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China