He is the man many Malaysians love to hate. Once considered his nation’s political tour de force, Anwar Ibrahim has spent the greater part of the past two decades in jail, wrapped up in court proceedings and enduring what he calls a long-standing smear campaign — from being labeled a chauvinist and Zionist to facing accusations that he is homosexual, guilty of sodomy and anti-Muslim.
Now Anwar is fighting his last fight: to be Malaysia’s next prime minister, a battle for which he has been preparing for a very long time.
At speeches and rallies Anwar is vibrant, compelling and persuasive. In person he is slight, aging and soft-spoken, sipping black tea with honey as he outlines why his opposition alliance expects to usurp Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak and the incumbent Barisan Nasional (National Front) party, which has governed Malaysia for nearly 60 years.
“The mood is there, the mood for change,” Anwar said from his office at the multifloor headquarters of his People’s Justice party in central Kuala Lumpur. “I’m very optimistic that we will wrest control and make major inroads.”
Anwar has long been a contender to rule Malaysia, but his political career has suffered vertiginous highs and lows. The spectacular ascent that saw him grace the cover of Newsweek as Asian of the Year and become the heir apparent of Malaysia’s then-prime minister Mahathir Mohamad was met with an equally spectacular crash in 1998, when the two fell out and Anwar was imprisoned for six years on corruption and sodomy charges, claims he repeatedly dismissed as politically motivated.
Times have not been easy since his release in 2004. Despite leading an opposition coalition to a famous result in the 2008 general election, when it stole one-third of the parliamentary seats and five states from the National Front, Anwar soon found himself facing new sodomy charges, accusations that were only dismissed this January due to lack of evidence.
However, his movement is full of hope. Elections are expected to be called any time in the next nine months and even those who do not openly back Anwar often support what he stands for: relief from an autocratic and out-of-touch government they say has ruled Malaysia for too long. In April, tens of thousands of Malaysians took to the nation’s streets to demand electoral reform at rallies organized by Bersih, an opposition-backed coalition of civil society groups whose name means “clean” in Malay.
According to political columnist Art Harun, Bersih has thrown “a massive spanner in the [government] works” as increasingly informed activists point to numerous corruption scandals and police brutality as proof that government reform is necessary. Yet when it comes to voting they will have to contend with a determined ruling party that has been accused of playing dirty to win.
“The electoral roll is our Achilles’ heel and their way of winning,” said opposition MP and Anwar’s 31-year-old daughter Nurul Izzah Anwar, herself a participant in April’s rally. “Before it was just small instances ... Now we’ve unearthed a whole pool of data.”
She claims that in her constituency alone she has 10,000 voters who suddenly “appeared” on electoral lists.
Anwar’s greatest task will be proving that he can actually instigate the change Malaysians have long been calling for, said Malaysia expert Bridget Welsh of Singapore Management University.
“Four months after Bersih there are two important issues: the management of the economy and who can manage the economy best, and who can offer more options in democratic governance,” she says. “The third aspect is whether this election will be free and fair ... so what we have is a situation where the integrity of the [electoral] process is as important as the process itself.”
Matters are complicated by new charges that Anwar faces of opposing a court order at the Bersih rally. If convicted he would not be able to stand for office in the next election. He denies the allegations.
If elected, Anwar knows that his will be a tricky balancing act in a nation that sells itself as “Moderate Malaysia,” where even his own opposition alliance spans his People’s Justice party, the Pan-Malaysian Islamic party and the ethnic Chinese Democratic Action party.
“We have discussed economic policies, social policies and religious positions, and we have come to agreements,” he said of his own alliance.
“But there’s a big, huge internal battle” — he strikes every word with his finger on his desk — “among the [wider] Malaysian community between the fanatics and the extremists to petition broader, more liberal tolerance. We call ourselves liberals — [but] we must put in check, not through brute force, but through active and vibrant intellectual discourse, these [extremist] aberrations.”
Voters might be hoping for change at the next general election but they know they cannot expect it.
“What we want to see is a multiparty democracy where, every two or three years, the [leading] party will change,” Bersih leader Ambiga Sreenavasan said. “We’re not averse to Barisan coming back, but if parties think they’re going to lose power, they behave a lot better. [This] is about power coming back to the people. It’s about us being in charge.”
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations