I often share photographs of beautiful scenery from Taiwan to encourage people to visit. However, when people go on a trip they expect to return home safely and now that the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮) is preparing to install fuel rods and start test operations, it presents a clear and present danger to tourism on the northeast coast.
A well-known Taiwanese bicycle manufacturer used to run a bike rental shop in the coastal town of Fulong (福隆), but the shop closed down several years ago because high humidity and the sea wind made the bicycles’ metal parts vulnerable to rust. As the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant has been under construction on and off for 20 years, how can one be sure that its metal parts are not also rusty?
Once construction is completed, hopefully the power plant will operate without leaking radiation. However, what would happen if a fire were to break out and emit black smoke while the annual Ho-Hai-Yan Gongliao Rock Festival was being held on Fulong Beach? Probably most of the people at the festival would not know the difference between an ordinary fire alarm and one used for a nuclear accident. People could be trampled to death as panicking tourists rushed to leave.
What if a nuclear accident really happened at Fulong? Judging by what happened at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Japan and the scenes described in the book Voices from Chernobyl, the outcome could be ghastly.
If everyone within a 20km radius had to be evacuated, that would cover the whole of the northeast coast, including Rueifang (瑞芳), Pingsi (平溪), Shuangsi (雙溪) and Gongliao in New Taipei City and Toucheng (頭城) in Yilan County. It would involve moving tens of thousands of residents, plus large numbers of tourists.
Popular tourist spots in the area include Fulong beach, Shueinandong (水湳洞), Jinguashih (金瓜石), Jioufen (九份), Shenao (深澳) fishing port, the waterfall at Shihfen (十分), Bitoujiao (鼻頭角), Honeymoon Bay (蜜月灣), Dasi (大溪) and Waiao (外澳) beach. All these scenic spots would become forbidden zones.
A lot of military and engineering personnel would have to be brought in to remove radioactive dust from people’s bodies and clothing and clean up radioactive materials emitted by the power plant and the machinery and equipment used for the task could not be used again.
Over the years, people affected by radioactive pollution could give birth to deformed children or suffer from depression. The cost of dealing with these problems would be borne by the already financially stressed National Health Insurance program.
Although the Disaster Prevention and Protection Act (災害防救法) and the Public Assistance Act (社會救助法) do not refer specifically to nuclear accidents, their legislative intent would allow them to be interpreted as doing so. According to these laws, city and county social welfare departments would have to assign social workers to help evacuees settle in other areas and distribute relief supplies. The problem is that Taiwan is already short of social workers, and they are often overworked. It would be terrible if social workers were to die from exhaustion, as has happened before.
If evacuees cannot get used to their new lifestyles or accept that their hometowns have been ruined, it is likely that some of them would go back and secretly plant crops. If they sold the produce, it would spread radioactivity around and lead to a food safety crisis. Some evacuees might suffer from discrimination and even attempt suicide. Then firefighters, doctors, nurses, social workers and counselors would all get tied up dealing with the problem.
If the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant really does go into operation, I will no longer be able to recommend the northeast coast as a tour destination.
In 1978, Austria decided that it did not want nuclear power plants. One nuclear power plant was built, but it never operated and was later turned into a museum. The entrance fee visitors pay helps cover the loss suffered by the power companies that built the plant. Only if Taiwan does likewise will people be able to feel really safe when visiting the northeast coast.
Chang Tzu-yang is a writer.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under