Recently, Taiwanese have sunk into a feeling of anxiety as the country’s economic indices fall behind South Korea, Singapore and Hong Kong. We now have to settle for being bottom performer of the four Asian tiger economies, and the extent to which Taiwan lags behind South Korea is a particular cause of vexation.
Constitutionalism, democracy and rapid economic growth are the tools that nations must carry to pass through the tunnel of modernization. All three are essential. It is just that after passing through the modernization tunnel the scenery looks very similar to how it was beforehand. At the same time, once a nation has adopted constitutionalism and democracy, these conditions come to be taken for granted just like air and sunlight. This makes it easy to forget that constitutionalism and democracy are the foundations of economic growth and the guarantors of the fruits of that growth.
Among the four Asian tigers, only Taiwan has passed through the modernization tunnel driven by its civil society. Hong Kong and Singapore have only experienced a commercial type of economic growth, while constitutionalism and democracy have not rooted into those places and they have not developed into civil societies.
South Korea, for its part, has US troops stationed on its soil and North Korean troops facing it across the border. In addition, South Korea has historically gone through endless love-hate relationships with Japan, China and Russia. Consequently, the country has had to work hard to remain in modernity. Resentment is the central concept for understanding South Korean society, and resentment is something that takes a lot of hard work to shake off. The external expression of this resentful mentality is super-strong nationalism and pride. Such a society is not well suited to constitutionalism and democracy and in economics it follows a path of state-led developmentalism.
Following Japan’s Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear disaster last year, not only Japan, but other nations, including Germany and Italy, and even Taiwan have reconsidered the question of whether to keep nuclear power or not. However, South Korea is still moving ahead with nuclear energy and is building more atomic power plants. Besides, South Korea has also been keener than countries such as Taiwan, Japan and China to negotiate economic partnership agreements and other multilateral and interregional economic cooperation and trade deals, and it does not balk at sacrificing its national interests to achieve them. In other words, economic growth is South Korea’s undisputed national goal.
A country like that is too idealistic and its goals are too clear-cut, so it does not stand much chance of moving into the postmodern age. There is therefore no need for Taiwan to compare itself with South Korea. It is neither possible nor necessary to make such a comparison.
From the wide perspective of world history, Taiwan’s policies of a diplomatic truce, cross-strait detente, ending conscription, halting construction of the Kuokuang petrochemical plant and reconsidering nuclear power policies are not ideas suddenly thought up by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his administration. Rather, they are tangible signs of Taiwan’s entry into a postmodern stage.
Some national goals will inevitably be lost. While the nation state has not yet been formed, countries we once took to be our enemies no longer occupy that role. That is a bad thing for the national imagination, but is a good thing for getting Taiwan out of modernity. The next thing to happen will be that Taiwan’s invisible sectors will be highly activated. Social problems that have stayed concealed in subterranean aquifers will come gushing out — things like the widening gap between rich and poor and the breakdown of family values. All these problems will challenge the legitimacy of those in government and the essential value of democracy. Finally, the ideology that places economic development above all else will also be challenged. In other words, people will rethink the idea that happiness depends on modernity.
The situation we see in Taiwan today is just the confusion that arises in a period of social transformation. Collective anxiety is hard to avoid, but in reality there is no need to be so worried. As long as we bear in mind that we have the most complete democracy and the most mature civil society of the four Asian tigers, we can set our minds at rest. As great goals and great ideals are dispelled with the arrival of the postmodern age, Haruki Murakami’s idea of enjoying “a little happiness in hand” is a suitable remedy for easing the growing anxieties of postmodern Taiwan.
Chen Yung-feng is executive director of Tunghai University’s Center for Japan Area Studies.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under