KMT fails the Tibet test
We are once again faced with an incongruous Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) that has run Taiwan for the past four years like a subsidiary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), protests to the contrary notwithstanding.
We need look no further than President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration’s oafish treatment of Tibetans and Uighurs and other oppressed peoples in China to see this. How else can the government justify its silence (and in some respect, approbation) in the face of genocide, if not because the KMT respects and admires China’s heavy-handed methods for dealing with dissent?
I can understand the failure of US President Barack Obama to stridently confront China over these issues as he should (although certainly not to excuse in the least the complete failure of a supposed Nobel laureate to lead the world as US president on these imperative and urgent issues), considering his current overly timid US policy on China.
However, what excuse can the KMT give, other than to proclaim that Tibet and Xinjiang are part of China and “splittism” and dissent are not acceptable?
How can Taiwan fulfill its supposed key role in the world of serving as an example to China of all that is good, democratic and free if the KMT does not confront China about its human rights violations and the CCP’s long term plans to eradicate Tibetan and Uighur culture, language and peoples? Ma’s insipid occasional statements about these things are neither convincing nor effective.
Does the KMT not understand that Tibet and Xinjiang, Falun Gong and Chinese dissidents and activists serve as reminders to Taiwan of what the CCP has in store for it down the road when the KMT negotiates its supposed (and false) peace with China?
Of course not. In fact, Ma has refused to differentiate himself from the CCP so much so that it appears that the KMT and CCP are one, and we can no longer tell where one ends and the other begins.
Why else would the KMT admire China so much? I suspect it is because the KMT accepts the CCP’s methods, and we might expect after the KMT’s unification with China — which is the heartfelt goal of the hardcore KMT members — a regression to the days of martial law and tyranny and the eradication of everything Taiwanese, just like the KMT’s brother, the CCP, has served up to the Chinese every day for the past 63 years.
Lee Long-hwa
New York
Stricter is not always better
I doubt the implementation of stricter adoption laws to prevent parents from regretting their adoption and selling children will work very well (“Stricter adoption laws enacted,” June 4, page 2).
It is suggested that many parents regret adopting when the adopted children do not meet their expectations.
The implementation of stricter laws seems to be a good idea. However, at the same time, it also makes it harder for parents to adopt children. If a couple want to adopt children, they need to take lots of courses and even pass some examinations. If they do not, they are forbidden from adopting. People who yearn to be parents but cannot pass the examinations are likely to use private means to achieve their goal. That is to say, they are likely to adopt illegally, or even to buy children. The market for selling children will prosper even more, which may lead to more problems.
In this case, the law not only fails to stop parents who adopt children through private channels from feeling regret, but it also makes an increasing number of people willing to take a risk and buy children.
The stricter law is well-intentioned. However, the difficulty of adopting may also lead some people to break the law. Therefore, I cannot be sure whether a stricter law will be better.
Clara Lai
Taipei
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs