President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has formally begun his second term in office amid seething public resentment. Where is Ma going to lead Taiwan?
Apart from livelihood issues, what concerns people most in Taiwan is the direction of cross-strait relations. Taiwan has gradually opened its doors to Chinese tourists and students over the past four years. As the government relaxes restrictions day by day, it is conceivable that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait will enter a new era of comprehensive exchanges, or even political negotiations, within the next four years.
Taiwan no longer has any option but to work with “dynamic China,” voluntarily or not. The question is, can Taiwan effectively safeguard its own values as it does so? Can it highlight its own existence as a nation as it promotes “peaceful development” with Beijing? To put it simply, how should Taiwan make friends with China?
Cross-strait relations are one of the strong points of Ma’s Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Ma was re-elected partly because many voters believe that he would be able to stabilize cross-strait relations. Undoubtedly, the cross-strait peace index has improved significantly over the past four years, while the chance of war has fallen to the lowest ever since the KMT government relocated to Taiwan in 1949.
Plus, while the benefits of signing the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement with China remain unclear, at least Taiwan need no longer worry about being left behind, now that it has climbed aboard the Chinese express train that is leading the world economy.
However, while more cross-strait exchanges take place, even some pro-blue supporters are asking themselves whether Taiwan is compromising its sovereignty. Increasingly, countries suffer similar anxieties when dealing with a rising China. Still, Taiwan is in a more difficult situation, because China does not claim sovereignty over other countries, but it does over Taiwan and it will expect some change in the national identity of Taiwanese.
Regrettably, Ma seems unaware of the anxiety that people here are feeling. This can be seen in his half-baked cross-strait discourse in his inaugural address this year. As in his first inaugural address, which he delivered four years ago, Ma once again upheld the title of the Republic of China (ROC). However, the nation’s official title rarely appears in cross-strait exchanges these days and has little international visibility.
Everyone knows that there is a major disparity between the status of the two sides on the world stage. Even if they set aside the thorny issue of national status, China’s position as a sovereign state remains unquestioned while the ROC gradually fades away under the principle of “shelving controversies.” If this goes on, Taiwan might lose all chance of making its voice heard in the international community.
So, how can Ma find the right formula to ease Taiwanese anxiety about losing sovereignty? The Ma administration should change its thinking on cross-strait relations by boldly adjusting the kind of friendship that it has sought to foster in its dealings with China over the past four years.
Generally, there are two ways to make friends. Ma’s choice up till now has been the Chinese way, under which a person avoids saying or doing anything that his friends might not like. That would explain why neither former KMT chairmen Lien Chan (連戰) or Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) mentioned the ROC when they met Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤).
Instead, in March of this year Wu floated the formula of “one country, two areas” as a way of testing China’s reaction. His standpoint can hardly be compared with that of former Straits Exchange Foundation chairman Koo Chen-fu (辜振甫), who bravely pronounced the ROC’s national title when he met with then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) in Beijing in October 1998.
Admittedly, Ma’s Chinese way of friendship has been quite effective in creating a congenial atmosphere as he makes his first attempts to build mutual trust with China. However, as the two sides interact according to this Chinese mode of friendship, the ROC’s visibility has faded away bit by bit and that is precisely what is making Taiwanese people worried.
A quite different way of making friends is the Western way, which emphasizes that friends should tolerate each other’s different values. The world’s major countries all adopt this method when dealing with China. Although countries like the US, France and Australia have frictions with China from time to time, they try not to let those frictions get in the way of their friendly dealings with the Chinese. In agreeing to disagree, they state their differences with China when the time seems appropriate and seek to decide what direction talks will take and occupy the high ground. They do not find it necessary to make excessive concessions in the hope of getting into Beijing’s good books.
The phrase “shelving controversies” occurred twice in Ma’s 2008 inaugural address, but there was no sign of it in his inaugural speech this time. This change indicates that Ma is preparing for the launch of cross-strait political talks. After four years of interaction the two governments have built up a certain degree of mutual trust. Nevertheless, if Ma’s approach to cross-strait affairs is not one of acquiescing to China and moving toward the “eventual unification” that Beijing hopes to see, and if he really wants to safeguard and strengthen the ROC’s existence then as he begins to prepare for political talks with China he should also adjust his mode of friendship-building with his Chinese counterparts.
John Lim is an associate research fellow at the Institute of Modern History at Academia Sinica.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.