The first half of the year has come and gone almost without a trace, but we still have no clue if the economy will start to rebound this quarter after struggling through the first two quarters.
The continued uncertainties in the global economy underlined by the European debt crisis, the US’ weak economic recovery and slowing growth in China have resulted in worse-than-expected export growth for Taiwan over the past six months, and consumers have responded by becoming conservative about their spending. Consequently, some economic research institutes have lowered their GDP growth forecast for the nation to below 3 percent this year, and the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics is likely to follow suit when it updates its forecast at the end of this month.
Meanwhile, several executives of local technology companies have taken note of Samsung Electronics Co’s aggressive business expansion and South Korea’s model of economic development, suggesting that Taiwan should learn from Seoul’s firm support of domestic industries and its ambition to secure free-trade agreements with other countries.
The United Daily News Group last week organized a financial and economic forum, where business leaders, industry professionals and academics shared their concerns about the nation’s economic prospects and warned against irresponsible partisan politics and a directionless government that is liable to sacrifice the nation’s competitive edge and long-term prosperity.
Unfortunately, in today’s Taiwan, if you are so naive as to believe that the government and legislators can understand the nation’s development woes and figure out what to do about the economy, more fool you. Moreover, if you should ever have doubts about the nation’s long-term goals of free trade and economic liberalization, do not expect the government to be solely responsible for this matter, because the nation as a whole — including its people and businesses — is not yet ready for this move, despite the concerns about Taiwan’s over-reliance on the Chinese economy.
There is no doubt that some small industries, especially in the agricultural sector, would get hurt in the nation’s pursuit of further trade liberalization — either from the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement that Taiwan signed two years ago with China or the free-trade talks the nation is conducting with other countries. Indeed, some will benefit from the trade liberalization process and others will have to pay for it. However, it is the public’s fear of the impact of overall trade liberalization and the government’s populist policies toward certain industries that prevent the nation from becoming a key base of services operations and manufacturing.
Make no mistake, income inequality and poverty exist in Taiwan and the nation’s capitalist market economy does need some fixing, but we should not compromise a belief in seeking a freer market and a society where people can care about the ethics of commerce such as fair trade and trade justice.
To get rid of protectionist sentiment and fears about trade liberalization, governments around the world have worked hard to strengthen their people’s sense of identity with the global community. Many have also taken pre-emptive measures to help upgrade their industries and address changes in their job markets, which is a painful and time-consuming process.
Few can argue against the benefits of opening up Taiwan’s market to the world and the long-term advantage of market liberalization to our national competitiveness, but people remain fearful about trade liberalization. A clear-sighted and far-reaching government that is also able to easily explain its policies is not yet in sight.
Like our economy, the government struggled through the first half of the year, and it is likely to continue struggling in the second half, based on its current situation.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.