The government has trumpeted its use of “soft power” over what it has called the confrontational policies of its predecessor, and has claimed many achievements in the international field as a result. However, it would appear that in some cases, noodles in a bowl of beef noodle soup contain more fiber.
Take the response of the Mongolian and Tibetan Affairs Commission this week after it was pressed by activists to speak to Beijing and urge it to respect the human rights and religious freedoms of Tibetans. The activists made the call on Tuesday, which happened to be the UN’s International Day in Support of Victims of Torture. How appropriate. They said that given the degree of interaction between the leaders on either side of the Taiwan Strait, it was Taiwan’s responsibility to press Beijing on this issue.
In response, the commission spokesman said the government has paid close attention to a wave of self-immolations by Tibetans and has urged China to respect human rights and religious freedoms.
He then went on to say the commission would not confront China with “extreme measures,” but that the government could try to exercise its influence on visiting Chinese officials by bringing them to government agencies responsible for ethnic minority affairs and to “show them how we handle such issues.”
Mongolian and Tibetan Affairs Commission Minister Luo Ying-shay (羅瑩雪) made a similar claim about the efficacy of such exchanges back in March when she turned down an invitation from lawmakers to take part in a parade to mark the 53rd anniversary of the 1959 Tibetan uprising against Chinese rule.
She said the commission neither issues statements about the current situation in Tibet nor organizes events to commemorate the uprising because “it’s actually useless.” She said exchanges with Chinese officials were “a more effective way to help solve the Tibet issue.”
Since the government has not repressed the rights of Tibetans living here to exercise their religion and has not faced a wave of self-immolations, what exactly could government officials show visiting Chinese?
The Mongolian and Tibetan Affairs Commission runs a cultural center housing regional clothing from the areas, photographs of Mt Kailash and religious artifacts, but hardly anyone visits. Talk about useless.
China does not need more examples of how to present Tibetan culture — it has the Lama Temple in Beijing with ersatz monks, an exhibition that seeks to prove Beijing’s claim to have run things there for hundreds of years, and it has been massaging the messages coming out of Lhasa for decades.
Tibetan government-in-exile Prime Minister Lobsang Sangay this week said the self-immolations were a message from an oppressed and desperate people who want to assert their freedom. “It’s not just that it’s a desperate act, but also a political act,” he told the Sydney Morning Herald. “Peaceful protests, peaceful rallies are not allowed. The statements they leave behind consistently say they want freedom.”
In the face of such desperation, those who have the freedom to speak out have the moral imperative to do so, not just sit back and hope that “exchanges” with an arrogant and racist bureaucracy will somehow affect a modicum of change.
The freedoms the Tibetans so desperately seek are the ones we fought hard to achieve ourselves. That alone gives us the right to speak up for those that Beijing seeks to restrict and silence.
Just as much as this government wants improved ties with China, what it and its officials have forgotten is that Taiwanese have something Beijing wants: improved relations and eventually political talks. That means we have the power to say no and to press Beijing whenever and wherever — and for as long as we can.
Soft power is worthless if there is not something concrete backing it up.
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry