The cash cows on Carlos Marques’ farm used to be nothing but that: herds of dairy cattle that grazed the grassy, rolling hills of his property, where most of the dense tropical forest was cut down long ago for pastures and cropland.
However, the trees are starting to put money in his pocket as well.
The 68-year-old farmer is part of a pilot project that aims to reverse the economics of environmental destruction by paying farmers to preserve the forests that protect a crucial watershed, using money from some of the millions of people who use that water.
It is the sort of initiative that is at the heart of the UN’s Rio+20 Earth Summit, the three-day mega-conference that ended yesterday and aimed to push sustainable development to the top of the world’s agenda.
“It used to be that the forest was worth nothing,” said Fernando Veiga, water funds manager at the Nature Conservancy, the environmental organization that helped spearhead the Rio Claro-area project along with a Brazilian NGO and the state and municipal governments. “But we know how crucial living trees are to the planet and now they have a monetary value.”
Proponents insist that sustainable development — which allows economic growth to meet people’s current needs while preserving natural resources for the future — is the only way to prevent an environmental meltdown that could prove catastrophic for the planet and humanity.
However, critics contend that the idea often serves as a front that permits governments and companies to make noise about protecting the environment while permitting business to continue as usual.
Looking out onto the rounded hills that surround Marques’ farm near the tiny town of Rio Claro, 130km south of Rio de Janeiro, it is hard to believe this entire region was once swathed in dense vegetation. Devastated by centuries of deforestation — first for coffee plantations, then for charcoal and now for cattle raising and urban sprawl — Brazil’s Atlantic Forest has been whittled down to just 12 percent of its original size and scientists say it ranks as one of the world’s most threatened ecosystems.
The hills around Rio Claro are now almost bald, with just a sparse covering of grass that is often chewed down to the root by the rangy cattle that graze here. With little to anchor the earth into place, erosion has cut vivid gashes of rusty red soil.
This desolate landscape holds the source for the Guandu River, which provides 80 percent of Rio’s water. Because of deforestation and erosion, water is less abundant than locals say it once was and silt from the erosion and other pollutants seep into the tributaries of the Guandu, as well as the river itself. That forces water officials to heavily treat the water to make it usable, which costs the city US$500 million a year, according to environmentalists. Despite that, most Rio residents who can afford it drink bottled water.
On Marques’ property, for example, the brook that once babbled its way across his land had dried up, like many other streams in the area, the farmer said.
The Nature Conservancy and partner organization Instituto Terra developed the Guandu Water Fund to protect Rio’s water supply by investing in the forests that help generate the water itself.
Under the pilot project, inaugurated in 2009, US$500,000 in fees paid by big water consumers are being doled out to small farmers around Rio Claro who pledge to conserve their forests or allow swathes of their land to be reforested. Farmers sign a contract promising to keep their animals out of protected plots and organizers send out teams of locally hired employees to fence in the areas and plant thousands of saplings from a potpourri of about 80 native plant species.
The payouts are mostly small — Marques receives just US$640 a year for his 25 protected hectares — but advocates say even symbolic amounts help change people’s attitudes toward conservation.
“I used to think of the trees as mine, to use as I saw fit, but now I see things differently,” said Marques, a father of five and grandfather of five. “The trees that grow here are mine, but lots of other people depend on them, too, so by saving even just one single tree, I am performing a service for all of humanity.”
Since he joined the project three years ago, the dried-up stream has been resuscitated. At first it was a mere trickle, he said, but now it has grown into a thick rope of water.
With real, measurable gains for 9 million consumers in Rio de Janeiro, for the forest and for the locals who call it their home, the Guandu Water Fund embodies the win-win situation for people and the environment that sustainable development aspires to be.
Such initiatives are gaining traction among policymakers as a way to slow the kind of wholesale environmental destruction that has been blamed for the rise in devastating droughts, floods and other natural disasters in recent years.
The notion of sustainable development was born well ahead of the current conference’s precursor, the UN’s 1992 Earth Summit, which helped put climate change on the world agenda, but it remains an amorphous and divisive concept.
“Definitions of just what is sustainable development vary, society by society,” said Jeffrey Sachs, the economist who heads Columbia University’s Earth Institute. “But while there are big debates about the specifics and how to balance ... the economy, the environmental and the social concern, I think that the basic idea that we have three bottom lines, not one, is the most important idea.”
Still, it has been hard to agree on how to implement it.
Weeks of bickering between rich and poor countries delayed agreement on the final summit conclusions and the result has disappointed environmental groups, who have lambasted it as toothless and inadequate.
“What most people at the summit are talking about when they talk about sustainable development is nothing but business as usual under a different name, something that will deliver misery to many and profit to a few,” said Daniel Mittler, a political director at Greenpeace who headed the environmental group’s delegation at Rio+20.
“But it does not have to be: Sustainability is an agenda that can deliver for people and the planet at the same time,” Mittler said, adding that political will and direction are needed to make it work on a global scale.
“The tragedy of Rio+20 is that governments are failing to grasp that opportunity,” he added.
While decisionmakers squabble over language, farmer Marques in Rio Claro said he is sold on sustainable development.
“I need money to live, but I also need clean air and clean water,” he said. “This project gives me all three at the same time.”
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations