All these words are Greek — crisis, chaos and apocalypse. Or, if the world was more clever, this could still end in catharsis and renewal.
Market furies tear the heart out of Europe, first Greece, then Spain, Italy and France, and finally the world — so even beleaguered pro-Europeans give the euro’s survival no more than a 50:50 chance.
If all that is left is a tight little German and northern league, why would the EU stay together after that?
The guttering flame of the European idea is hard to keep alight in this hurricane, but it is not impossible. Look how decisively the French and Greek electorates reject the austerity economics that is killing growth in most of the EU.
The tide of opinion is turning when even Standard & Poor’s at last admits: “Austerity alone risks becoming self-defeating.”
The policy is tested to destruction. A patched-together coalition between old parties that brought Greece to its knees through corruption and cronyism only won because its pledge to get a better deal was marginally more convincing to a despairing electorate, short of food, medicine and fuel.
However, anti-austerity was the only message. Either default on debt or repay only once solid growth makes it feasible — more austerity leads back down the death spiral vortex.
If the new Greek government gets no genuine relaxation of impossible bailout terms, more cuts may propel such protests that the radical SYRIZA will find itself in power shortly. How comfortable to be opposing, just a hair’s breadth from power. It was not sour grapes (courtesy of Aesop, another Greek) for SYRIZA leaders to claim this is where they prefer to be for now.
Meanwhile in Britain, gleeful anti-Europeans gloat: “I told you so,” with smirks on the faces of Norman Lamont, Nigel Farage and the rest.
British Prime Minister David Cameron on Monday yet again wagged his finger emptily at Germany, telling it to intervene, a bizarre stance from one who shares its austerity policy. In all the years of behaving badly to its neighbors, Britain has never been so ignored or so irrelevant to the key decisions taken by its vital trading partners.
Despite sad reminders of former British prime minister Gordon Brown’s worst traits at last week’s Leveson hearings, compare and contrast Cameron’s vacuity with Brown’s finest hour — when no other leader stepped up, Brown galvanized the world to take fast action with a market-stunning £1 trillion (US$1.57 trillion) rescue at the G20 in 2009. Cameron could not galvanize a flea circus.
Instead, his party wallows in a European crisis that will blow back at Britain. True, the blizzard will conveniently white out British Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne’s egregious economic errors, the zero growth and double-dip. Roll on a referendum, urge the Europhobes, but in or out of what?
Their fantasy is that Britain can slip away to the European economic area on pick ‘n’ mix terms, undercutting EU currencies and irksome trade rules — why would Europe not wreak revenge for Britain’s obnoxious behavior all these years?
At the G20 meeting on Monday, no leader emerged to take the initiative, with US President Barack Obama being deep in a re-election campaign and each country protecting its interests.
Germany could save Greece, but not Spain and Italy. Germany could let the European Central Bank act as a firewall. It could allow inflation to ease the path and embrace growth before debt. However, faced by a choice between breaking the euro and abandoning German orthodoxy, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and her party would rather let most of Europe go — she has failed to warn her people of the enormous costs of that.
Neither Obama nor Cameron could be seen to pay to save Europe — nor China, nor anyone else — and yet they all know the far greater cost of global collapse.
This is a return to the 1930s, Keynesians say — look where that leads politically. Or is this a dark echo of World War I?
Civilized countries thought protectionism and trade wars could never lead to bloodshed. Yet the world is no saner now than then. Countries pulling up drawbridges, undercutting and cheating each other in times of declining living standards, can still lead to European bloodletting.
Look at the venom — the sneering at Greeks, Italians and Spaniards, lazy southern layabouts. Blaming ineffective governments nastily morphs into blaming whole nations of inferior people. Germans are again represented as spike-helmeted automatons, bidding for a fiscal and political union that would reduce proud nations to town councils under Berlin’s thumb.
Germany v Greece on the Euro 2012 soccer field may be a comic coincidence this week, but nobody should dismiss the seriousness of the EU’s “never again” founding purpose.
Europe’s impasse needs new purpose, after the old economic certainties helped cause this cataclysm.
Even if the EU scrapes through, that will not be enough. What then?
French President Francois Hollande and British Labour Party leader Ed Miliband are calling a summit of Social Democrats this autumn to challenge dogma, and forge a growth and jobs program for construction and investment. Keynesian parties need to draw Europe-wide strength and credibility by working together. Hollande proposes a £120 billion redirection of EU funds to an emergency growth program — he should throw in the Common Agricultural Policy, too.
Abolishing tax havens, coordinating fair tax instead of destructive competition, ending secrecy of wealth and property ownership, cutting defense overspending by France, Britain and Greece — politically hard decisions are easier if Social Democrats can inspire people with the value of standing together, not falling apart.
The G20 may prove that there is no averting imminent calamity, but the right-wing austerity advocates who caused it will have no solutions for its repair. Europe is phenomenally rich, yet it has hardly tapped its own wealth. These governments are still in denial over the real depth of the emergency.
Germany imposed a solidarity tax to pay for reunification, taxing incomes, wealth and property. Britain has barely touched the abundance of its vast, undertaxed wealth. The British government can never rally the nation to unite in a crisis after hitting the weak hardest, with wealthy lifestyles remaining unchanged. The coalition may well fall apart sooner than expected. Labour needs to stand more ready than has yet been the case, with a radical alternative — easier to do as part of a Europe-wide appeal.
In wartime, bonds are issued to finance a national emergency by encouraging (or, from the rich, coercing) investment in a time of crisis. What Europe needs to escape the slump is a war footing — but this time without the war.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs